Search for: "Mark Harms" Results 6141 - 6160 of 10,422
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Bill Marler
It has been almost three long years since dusty Holly, Colorado, became the epicenter of a Listeria monocytogenes human tragedy. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am by INFORRM
On 17 July 2014, Nicola Davies J handed down judgment in the case of Building Register Ltd v Mark Weston ([2014] EWHC 2361 (QB)). [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 2:51 pm by admin
FTC “urges federal, state and local policy makers, as well as private and self-regulatory authorities, to consider whether a particular licensure regulation is likely to have a significant and adverse effect on competition, is targeted to address actual risks of harm to consumers, and is tailored to minimize any burden on competition, or whether less restrictive alternatives are available”. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 8:05 pm
In particular, Justice Breyer’s concurrence approved of restrictions that “limit the scope of their application, sometimes by requiring proof of specific harm to identifiable victims; sometimes by specifying that the lies be made in contexts in which a tangible harm to others is especially likely to occur; and sometimes by limiting the prohibited lies to those that are particularly likely to produce harm. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
 But, we decline [plaintiff’s] invitation to step onto the slippery slope of imposing a form of innovator liability on manufacturers for harm caused by a competitor's product. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:25 am by Scott Hervey
Dilution by tarnishment occurs when the reputation of a famous mark is harmed through association with another similar mark or trade name. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 4:22 am by SHG
  Perhaps the judge does not read or write in the English language, and was confused by all the squiggly black marks on the paper. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 8:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Mark McKenna andMark Lemley will be sad (comparea previous Uber case): this plausibly alleged a §43(a)(1)(A) violation. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:30 pm by JP Tarbutton
The fact that no single agency received top marks across the board presumably reflects, to some degree, the difficulty in administering all the elements of what the Center would like to see in a government disclosure program. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 10:35 am by Jeremy Thurman
While you can’t tell by looking if toys or play jewelry contain lead, cadmium or phthalates, packages are often marked that they are lead- or phthalate-free. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:07 am by SHG
The purpose of preventing police harming others is never furthered by promoting harm toward anyone. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:12 am
Stevens, supra quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 10:34 pm
The stakes in Mark Lawrence's Diocese of South Carolina are particularly high just now, with the dispute having entered the courtroom for a decisive trial in front of the Hon. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 2:06 pm by Jonathan Bailey
Finally, also in 2013, Partor Mark Driscoll was embroiled in a plagiarism scandal in his book A Call to Resurgence. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 6:33 am
Balance of harmUltimately, the judge held, it came down to the balance of irreparable harm. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 5:04 am by Kevin LaCroix
”   The article says that the prospect of enforcement activity focused on the cyberattack targets “marks a new front in the agency’s efforts to combat the rising threat hackers pose to public companies. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
But is there nothing to be learned from forty years of history—indeed, from international lawmaking generally—that could ensure additional remedy to victims of corporate-related human rights harm? [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
If a “bare . . . desire to harm” is all that is needed to declare a law invalid, “[h]ow easy it is, indeed how inevitable, to reach the same conclusion with regard to state laws denying same-sex couples marital status. [read post]