Search for: "Office of Hearing and Appeals" Results 6141 - 6160 of 23,875
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2019, 12:19 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
The Court of Appeals affirmed, holding that the County’s practice was not in accord with Gerstein‘s promptness requirement because no more than 36 hours were needed to complete the administrative steps incident to arrest. [read post]
14 May 2019, 10:57 am by Jonathan Holbrook
But considering the wide variety of circumstances where the rules could be helpful, I am curious to hear any thoughts in the comments about why they seem to be so rarely cited in the case law. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
”— President Lyndon Johnson and Chief Justice Earl Warren, Oval Office, June 13, 1968 QUESTION: Your subtitle refers to the “modern” Supreme Court. [read post]
13 May 2019, 3:47 pm
At Dealer’s office, Davis applied for financing from First Credit Finance (Financier). [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:05 am by Michael Geist
So what I’m hearing you saying is that back when the private sector privacy law, PIPEDA, as you said here in Canada was being drafted there were a number of different policy options presumably available to Canada. [read post]
13 May 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 14 May, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal Sequent Nominees Ltd v Hautford Ltd (a company registered in the British Virgin Islands). [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:05 pm by Sarah Madigan
But two concurring opinions in the appeals court decision indicate the existence of some contention over the policy—which could signal that the court might ultimately rule against DHS when it hears the case in full at a later stage in the litigation. [read post]
10 May 2019, 12:30 pm by John Ross
A district court suspended this program because it did not include an ability-to-pay hearing before the license was yanked. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:05 am
Benet also referred to an obiter observation of Mr Justice Henry Carr in Pathway IP where the allegation was that the hearing officer had construed the specification by reference to the class number. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:24 am
The Hearing Officer applied the Court of Appeal’s guidelines in Hai Tong Co (Pte) Ltd v Ventree Singapore Pte Ltd [2013] SGCA 26 at [62] when comparing the composite trademarks. [read post]
9 May 2019, 3:19 pm by Margaret Taylor
On May 2, Barr declined to appear for a scheduled hearing before the committee. [read post]