Search for: "R. MORALES" Results 6141 - 6160 of 13,682
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2009, 4:25 pm
  I have the right to bring my moral compass into play in saying no. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 9:11 am by Chris Borgen
Alas for Daredevil, Latveria is a nation unconcerned with morality and only vaguely concerned with commercial advantage or fear of hostile attack. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 6:01 pm
You have said USA should be a moral force. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 8:58 pm by T. Greg Doucette
In her case I was horrible as moral support because I’m pretty sure I cried more than she did (and it wasn’t even my dog). [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 5:45 am by Michael Geist
The CBC could raise some interesting moral rights arguments to counter the exceptions (if their employees have not waived their moral rights). [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:31 pm by Mays & Kerr LLC
The Labor Department scoffed at this objection, arguing that:  “You know what’s bad for morale? [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 8:11 am by Alan J. Borsuk
“If we don’t get this right, we might as well close up shop” in terms of  moral authority, said the Most Reverend Blase J. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 1:53 pm by Kenneth Anderson
—those NGOs devoted to questions of international morality, whether framed as human rights law, politics, or some other way. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:33 pm by Josh Blackman
This case held that the ACA provided the Trump Administration with the authority to promulgate religious and moral exemptions from the contraception mandate. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 3:24 am by Sean Wajert
  Here, the defendant argued, and the lower court agreed, there was no duty to the wife, using the traditional duty factors, including whether transaction was intended to affect the plaintiff; the foreseeability of harm to the plaintiff; the degree of certainty that the plaintiff suffered injury; the closeness of the connection between the defendant's conduct and the injury suffered; the moral blame attached to the defendant's conduct; and the policy of preventing future… [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 8:56 am by Kenneth Anderson
It continues to be debated and argued as a matter of law, morality, and policy. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 7:01 am by Kenneth Anderson
 I am slowly re-reading Theory of Moral Sentiments, alongside Ian Simpson Ross’s exemplary Life of Adam Smith, a book I read with insufficient attention when it first appeared, but which I am re-reading with a great deal of care. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 12:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
” And “conscience” is defined to mean “a sincerely held set of moral convictions arising from belief in and relation to God, or which, though not so derived, arises from a place in the life of its possessor parallel to that filled by God among adherents to religious faiths. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 3:18 pm by Kenneth Anderson
 A third is moral hazard, in the sense of inducing riskier behavior, in this case presumably lowering the inhibitions on behaviors that might lead to divorce; the approach of the policy seems to be to treat it like any other accident insurance, as an independently bad enough thing (even if monetarily compensated) so that in effect moral hazard doesn’t really operate. [read post]
The moral of the story is that, even if the state runs the process, human emotion deserves a seat at the table. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:27 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
And we should certainly not pretend that there is no moral difference between representing individuals facing a lifetime in prison and representing right-wing congressmen facing a world in which they are no longer able to legislate hate. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 9:33 am by Dale Carpenter
Much more important to me as a moral matter is the kind of argument made and the tone in which it is offered. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 6:25 pm by Ilya Somin
As discussed in my earlier post, I think the correct interpretation of Takings Clause would require compensation in at least some of these cases, and that compensation for owners of shut down businesses and other enterprises is often required as a matter of morality and policy, even if it is not dictated by the Constitution. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:37 am by Randy Kozel
Nor should it shock us if justices who emphasize factors such as contemporary moral values are inclined to overrule decisions they view as out of step with modern times. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:13 am by Eugene Volokh
If the Stolen Valor Act is struck down, military medals will still maintain their power to express our nation’s gratitude to true heroes, and to foster morale within the military. [read post]