Search for: "Session v. State" Results 6141 - 6160 of 6,592
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 10:57 am by Carrie Cordero, Quinta Jurecic
(Some immigrants who entered legally into the United States seeking asylum have also been separated from their children.) [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 4:06 pm by Jacob Fishman
At a juncture when both democratic and authoritarian regimes across the world are vested to persecuting their host Muslim populations, The New Crusades interrogates–through trenchant analysis and direct testimony of Muslims on the ground–how Islamophobia stands as a unifying global thread of both state and societal bigotry. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
  In a separate March 16, 2015 press release (here), the company announced that board, meeting that same day in extraordinary session, had “agreed to terminate” Patricio Contesse González, the company’s CEO. [read post]
5 May 2014, 6:16 am by Howard Knopf
Granted, Barry had very little time to speak, since he was only a “panelist” (and apparently a late addition at that) and not a full-fledged “speaker” on the session. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:41 am by SHG
They were debating whether much of the Supreme Court case of Dred Scott v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 4:46 am by Marty Lederman
Instead, Lincoln argued that the Suspension Clause itself empowered him to suspend the privilege of the writ in cases of rebellion or invasion, at least when Congress was not in session. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm by John Ross
The Pennsylvania House opens most legislative sessions with a prayer. [read post]
3 May 2018, 8:45 am by Amy Howe
” The film attributes the RBG phenomenon to the justice’s blistering dissents in 2013 and 2014, in cases like Shelby County v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 1:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
If Monday’s session had about it anything that seemed peculiar to electronic privacy under the Constitution, it was the Justices’ interest in whether federal or state laws that guarantee such privacy should be taken as creating an “expectation of privacy” under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 12:11 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That denial would apply to a military couple even if they are legally married under the laws of a state. [read post]