Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 6141 - 6160
of 10,140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
” Second, the drug is neither prescribed by a doctor or psychiatrist nor dispensed by a pharmacist, and has not been studied in the United States to determine its interaction with other drugs. [read post]
10 May 2013, 4:34 pm
A 1989 Ninth Circuit case and a 2012 Ninth Circuit case reapplied the doctrine to later dissemination of technical data to foreign powers; these cases analyzed the application of the law under United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 2:48 pm
In the short run, it upheld the deeply racist Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, which—as the name implies—barred most would-be Chinese immigrants from entering the United States. [read post]
15 May 2017, 4:47 pm
The Supreme Court has stated in Department of the Navy v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 3:27 am
Court Orders Dissolution of Holding Company Ending Ten-Year Fight for Control Matter of Ano, Inc. v Goldberg, Short Form Order, Index No. 601079/15 [Sup Ct Nassau County Feb. 2, 2016]. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 3:27 am
Court Orders Dissolution of Holding Company Ending Ten-Year Fight for Control Matter of Ano, Inc. v Goldberg, Short Form Order, Index No. 601079/15 [Sup Ct Nassau County Feb. 2, 2016]. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
Part 2 proposes that Section 230(c)(1) would not “prevent any State or unit of local government from enforcing a law that restricts any provider of an interactive computer service from facilitating the lease or rental of real property. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 8:04 am
, v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 2:16 pm
Fuentes v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:54 pm
It goes back to the Schofield decision to ascertain just what those "neutral principles" are:As the Schofield Court recognized:These neutral principles include First Amendment rights of individuals and corporations (see Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:21 pm
Ashcroft, which involved a U.S. citizen who sought habeas review in the United States while in the formal custody of Saudi Arabia, on the theory that the Saudi custody was proxy detention under the actual control of the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 5:15 am
Why did the President of the United States choose instead to deliberately violate federal law? [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 4:15 pm
The recent case of Mission Shores Association v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:25 am
” That memo cites a quote from an 1882 Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm
This generalization is true not just for companies in the United States but for all companies around the world. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:37 am
Although I try to include on this blog topics involving issues from outside the United States, because of my background and experience, U.S-related topics tend to predominate. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 9:09 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 5:30 am
Attorney General declined to appeal Wrenn v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:28 am
Rev. 743, 752-53 (2005); see also, e.g., United States v. [read post]
