Search for: "State v. Holder" Results 6141 - 6160 of 7,212
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2010, 11:21 pm by shirley
In the matter of Smuts v Booyens; Markplaas (Edms) Bpk and Another v Booysens [2001] ZASCA 57 (also 2001 (4) SA 15 (A)) the court held that the word “transfer” consisted of a number of steps within a private company setting: (a) an agreement to transfer, (b) the execution of the transfer document, and (c) registration of transfer. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:53 am by crush
Holder decision and the need for Congress to recognize an affirmative right to vote. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by Nicole Kellner-Swick
He can be reached at 248.786.3124 and sbest@weltman.com. [1] Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am by Andrew Hamm
United States) “The Boldest Moves: When and How to Make Them” (focusing on the power grab in Bush v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm by INFORRM
[Week commencing 13 August] Full Fact v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 17/08/2012; Joseph Horner v The Observer, Clause 1, 16/08/2012; Mr Christopher Mackin v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Jane Hughes v The Independent on Sunday, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Dr Yannis Alexandrides v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Alex Jarvis v Daily Mail, Clauses 3, 5, 15/08/2012; Inspired Thinking Group… [read post]