Search for: "State v. Husband" Results 6141 - 6160 of 7,278
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2010, 2:53 am by Dave
[with apologies to the most cited, and brilliant, socio-legal article: Marc Galanter, "Why the 'haves' come out ahead: Speculations on the limits of legal change"] Mr Justice Beatson dismissed a renewed application for judicial review in R(Husband) v Solihull MBC [2009] EWHC 3673 (Admin). [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 8:20 am by admin
 Although most of the couple’s income had been derived from the husband’s withholdings, the bankruptcy court judge ruled that the husband and wife were each entitled to 50% of the tax refund, based on the case of Bass v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:04 am by nyinjuries
Contrary to the defendant¹s contention, as stated by the Court of Appeals, ³[t]here is no requirement in Nallan [Nallan v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 12:05 pm by Jimmy Verner
 State Bar of Texas Section Report - Family Law - Summer 2009 by Jimmy L. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:52 am by SOIssues
The United States Supreme Court in 2003 stated in Smith v Doe that the ex post facto application of these Sex Offender Registration Laws was not Punitive in nature, but civil and regulatory intent. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 9:17 am by Deborah Wald
In the typical, heterosexual, marital context, all 3 of these factors will point to the same people (i.e. a husband and wife will be the biological parents, they will behave like parents, and they will have intended to be parents, at least from the moment they discovered the pregnancy). [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 11:32 am by Meriwether & Tharp
A decision of a Fulton County judge regarding jurisdiction in a custody modification case was recently overturned in Murillo v. [read post]