Search for: "State v. Mai" Results 6141 - 6160 of 133,202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2012, 6:26 pm by Andrew Frisch
The Court notes that the test from Stolt–Nielsen stated here may be more stringent that the appropriate test for contracts of adhesion. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:51 am by Jeff Welty
The few cases that I could find from other jurisdictions disagree about the propriety of the conduct: United States v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:51 am by Jeff Welty
The few cases that I could find from other jurisdictions disagree about the propriety of the conduct: United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:20 pm
The following is a reprint of a client advisory from last summer:On June 25, 2008, the United States Supreme Court in Exxon Shipping Company v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
The statement was made out of court so the “declarant” (person who made the statement) is unable to be cross-examined.The tricky part: hearsay may be admitted if the statement is not offered prove the truth of what was actually stated. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 2:20 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: In his 1929 encyclical, Divini Illius Magistri (On Christian Education), Pope Pius XI paid an extraordinary tribute to the United States, the Supreme Court, and more specifically, the Court’s interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment in Pierce v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 11:19 am by Karen Hoffmann
The California International Law Journal is the official publication of the State Bar of California International Law Section and is widely read by members of the State Bar of California. [read post]