Search for: "State v. P. B."
Results 6141 - 6160
of 6,786
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2008, 9:15 pm
§ 2401(b)(1). [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
State of Tennessee, No. 06-6208 In civil rights suit alleging that city police discriminated against plaintiffs in violation of the Ame [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 11:57 pm
Brooks, B. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:52 pm
P. app. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in… [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 5:01 pm
People v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 4:24 pm
Flagg v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 4:24 pm
Flagg v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
P. 26.2 and 16(a)(1)(F) mandate discovery of statements and polygraph results, respectively. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 11:38 am
P. 12(b)(6) is de novo does not mean that litigants are entitled to bypass the district court altogether. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 5:17 am
(B) When property is divided pursuant to the foregoing considerations the court must state its basis and reasons for not dividing the marital property equally between the parties, and the basis and reasons should be recited in the order entered in the matter [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 4:21 pm
§ 1395w-26(b)(3). [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 3:31 pm
P'ship, No. 07-0548 "In maritime claim against defendants for alleged nonpayment of contracts, decision in favor of plaintiffs is affirmed where: 1) the contracts between plaintiffs and defendants are maritime contracts; 2) the notice requirements of Rule B were met; 3) equitable factors did not weigh in favor of vacating the maritime attachments; and 4) a Rule 11 hearing was not required. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 4:29 pm
(b).) [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
(Id. at p. 217, fn. 15.) [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 3:54 pm
Fehribach v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:10 pm
D/B/A DOLLAR GENERAL STORE v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
On the following day, the FDIC signed a Purchase and Assumption Agreement (P&A Agreement) with State Bank and Trust Company (State Bank) that caused the insured deposits of Oakwood to be transferred to State Bank. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 11:11 pm
J. 38 *** Leonard P. [read post]
