Search for: "United States and it's agents" Results 6141 - 6160 of 11,795
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2016, 12:16 pm by Rishabh Bhandari, David Hopen
Apache helicopter gunships have been used in combat for the first time as part of the United States’ support of Iraqi forces battling the Islamic State outside Mosul, one of the Islamic State’s largest strongholds in Iraq. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 11:02 am
 As the 45th President of the United States, twice impeached, leaves office to an uncertain future, he was kind enough to have delivered a farewell address. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 12:34 am
United States, 932 F.2d 891, 894 (10th Cir. 1991).). [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 12:30 pm by Elliot Harmon and Nadia Kayyali
Just a few weeks ago, California passed one of the best digital privacy laws in the United States, largely thanks to pressure from voters. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 8:06 am
GENERAL PASSPORT FACTS By federal statute, the Secretary of State of the United States may issue a passport only to a United States citizen or national. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 5:34 pm
Noerr Motor Freight (1961), which arose in the legislative context, and United Mine Workers v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 6:27 am
In its news section, the site has some information on legislative initiatives related to its work.Kids with Food Allergies.com. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:33 am by Adina Ponta
During the current crisis, cyberattacks are proliferating in the United States and across the globe, the most serious being reported in the Czech Republic, Spain and France. [read post]
10 Aug 2024, 8:00 am by Ilya Somin
The CDC here was acting at the behest of two successive presidents of the United States, from different parties. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 7:22 am by Sarah Tate Chambers
Therefore, the account was not as personal as Hoofnagle’s in two ways—its creation and its use. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 4:37 am by Susan Brenner
  Brief of Appellee United States of America, U.S. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:03 am by April Doss
There were clearly no Fourth Amendment concerns in the initial collection, as this was classic FAA 702 targeting of a non-U.S. person outside the United States, and there are no allegations of improper targeting, retention, dissemination, or other use of the target’s communications. [read post]