Search for: "United States v. Place" Results 6141 - 6160 of 24,118
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2019, 3:30 pm by Renee Anderson
The volume’s editors (Arizona State University’s David H. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 9:43 am by Ben Allen
"  Finally,  citing the First Step Act, Wiseman argued the District Court erred in finding he was a career offender under the Guidelines because he had served less than a year imprisonment on each of his supposedly qualifying charges.In its decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 6:29 am by Peter Margulies
In making this finding, Tigar observed that the INA already has in place categorical bars to asylum involving an asylum applicant’s stay in another country prior to seeking asylum in the United States. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 3:12 am by Marie Nioche
It describes the likely effect of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union on the recognition and enforcement of judgments from EU Members States: “If the UK leaves the European Union without any new agreement in place allowing for mutual recognition and enforcement, the recognition and enforcement of judgments from EU Members States will prima facie only be possible under the existing common law rules. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 11:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
”  (Source: here ) No contingency fee system:  Contingency fee arrangement has been one of the distinguishing features of litigation in the United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 8:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
The court determined that the United States was TCG’s habitual residence on that date because the last shared intent of Carvajal and Gamba was that TCG live in the United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 5:41 am by Jessica Zhang, Andrew Patterson
Overview The federal statute criminalizing illegal entry into the United States, 8 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 11:38 am by Vishnu Kannan
  The Supreme Court’s application of Fourth Amendment protection to the attachment of a GPS tracking device to a car in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am by Yvette Mabbun and Kelly Vazhappilly
United States, 290 U.S. 13 (1933) (allowing a property owner to directly bring a Fifth Amendment claim for compensation upon the taking of the property, without pursuing, for example, the state-litigation requirement as contemplated in Williamson County)[13]; First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 8:27 am by Richard Primus
United States, which fires a loud shot across the bow of the administrative state, contained something like a fictionalized account of the facts behind Schechter Poultry. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:33 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case shows that the so-called "rule of completeness" has its limits.The case is United States v. [read post]