Search for: "United States v. Robert" Results 6141 - 6160 of 9,871
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2013, 9:49 pm
On June 25, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) overturned a Florida Supreme Court decision in, Koontz v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am by Don Cruse
Gambling machines STATE OF TEXAS v. $1,760.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 37 "8" LINER MACHINES, No. 12-0718 Per Curiam The Court agreed with the State that certain “eight-liner” machines qualified as gambling equipment for purposes of civil forfeiture. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am by Allison Trzop
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude covers United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:14 am by Jon Gelman
This is an ongoing battle in the United States and abroad, and the FDA will continue its criminal law enforcement and regulatory efforts,” said John Roth, director of the FDA’s Office of Criminal Investigations. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The General Perjury Statute (18 USC 1621) has been nicely encapsulated in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 11:19 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
In 1965, efforts to suppress the votes of minorities, particularly in the South, led the United States Congress to pass the historic Voting Rights Act (VRA), which has, for generations, been used to ensure that elections are free, fair, and accessible to all eligible voters. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:58 am
Madison — as quoted in the DOMA case, United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:30 am by Jane Chong
Alternatively, sovereign immunity applies to Plaintiff’s nonconstitutional claims, as the Westfall Act provides that the United States is the proper defendant for these claims and the Government has not waived sovereign immunity here. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:30 am by Jane Chong
Alternatively, sovereign immunity applies to Plaintiff’s nonconstitutional claims, as the Westfall Act provides that the United States is the proper defendant for these claims and the Government has not waived sovereign immunity here. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:03 am by Gregory Forman
To the surprise of no one who has been paying attention, the June 26, 2013 United States Supreme Court opinions in the cases of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 12:02 am by Will Baude
I realize that to most people it's not even the fifth-most-interesting case decided this week, but I was particularly surprised and pleased to see Chief Justice Roberts's concurrence on Monday in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm by LindaMBeale
  The judgment orders the United States to pay money that it would not disburse but for the court’s order. [read post]