Search for: ""fair use""
Results 6161 - 6180
of 10,402
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2012, 9:00 am
Earlier this week, a jury in the Northern District of California found that Google violated copyright laws when it used Java APIs to design Android—but could not reach a resolution on whether Google’s use of APIs constituted fair use. [read post]
10 May 2012, 7:17 am
Absent nominative fair use, we’re back with Sleekcraft. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:14 pm
Green Day, (a recent California case discussing fair use of public art as part of a concert backdrop); Forlenzo v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:14 pm
Green Day, (a recent California case discussing fair use of public art as part of a concert backdrop); Forlenzo v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:14 pm
Green Day, (a recent California case discussing fair use of public art as part of a concert backdrop); Forlenzo v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:14 pm
Green Day, (a recent California case discussing fair use of public art as part of a concert backdrop); Forlenzo v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 10:20 am
But usually enforcement is then against what’s arguably fair use, and people start to get an inflated view of their rights when they have a registration. [read post]
9 May 2012, 10:12 am
The judge broke apart the trial into copyright and patent portions and the jury was unable to reach a complete verdict in the copyright portions, returning a partial one finding that Google had infringed but was deadlocked on the issue of fair use. [read post]
9 May 2012, 7:40 am
To the extent that there are bits of non-functional code, I would say that's probably fair use as a matter of law to implement a compatible system. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:00 am
(Note the fairly enlightened explanation of U.S. fair use which may be helpful in your case.) [read post]
8 May 2012, 12:25 pm
However, the jury could not decide whether the use was improper or whether it instead should be considered an appropriate fair use. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:03 am
On the issue of copyright infringement, the jury ruled that Google had infringed one section of code but was deadlocked on the issue of fair use. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:06 am
[Los Angeles Times] * Google might’ve infringed upon Oracle’s copyrights, but a jury couldn’t decide if it constituted fair use. [read post]
7 May 2012, 9:12 pm
contain a fair use exception beyond the extremely narrow experimental use and de minimis defenses to patent infringement. [read post]
7 May 2012, 6:12 pm
Quite the day on the LexBlog Network, as today’s roundup brings us a good balance of legal analysis from a variety of subjects along with some great guidance for lawyers. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:07 pm
First, the court has to decide what to do with the fair use ruling. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:30 pm
Let’s take a look at exactly what “fair use” means, and under what circumstances using someone else’s material constitutes fair use. [read post]
7 May 2012, 2:54 pm
Today, a jury in California, deliberating in a case brought by Oracle against Google and alleging that Google infringed Oracle’s Java copyrights, concluded that Google did use the Java interfaces, but couldn’t reach any conclusion if that was protected use under the copyright "fair use" exception ("fair use" is a defense to copyright infringement). [read post]
7 May 2012, 1:47 pm
Google’s attorney indicated that he is moving for a mistrial due to the jury’s inability to reach a verdict on whether or not Google’s use was protected by the fair use doctrine. [read post]
7 May 2012, 1:21 pm
The jury did not reach a result on the issue whether Google’s use of the API packages constituted a fair use. [read post]
