Search for: "All Other Claimants" Results 6161 - 6180 of 13,101
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2015, 3:12 pm by INFORRM
  We would see a fine set of golden scales, with one plate marked ‘privacy’ and the other marked ‘public interest’. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 4:03 am
Debbie Harris, Cancellation No. 92058758 (December 16, 2015) [not precedential].A fraud claimant must prove that the other party knowingly made a false statement of material fact, with intent to deceive, that was relied upon by the injured party (the USPTO), to its detriment. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 3:46 am by INFORRM
Arden LJ (with whose judgment the other members of the court agreed) said that as far as she was concerned “there were no mitigating circumstances at all. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 12:07 pm by Helen Alvare
The empirical problems with all of these claims are overwhelming, and I can only scratch the surface here. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 7:11 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
However, some disabled people, especially children, are not able to work at all due to age and disability. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:33 am by Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle
” In other words, the state is free to “combat such abuses,” but may not do so by the massively overbroad disqualification of all Saturday Sabbatarians. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 1:06 pm by Frederick Gedicks
Congress obviously did not intend that prisoners, students, and other claimants could define “substantial” however they like; this addition makes sense only if courts, not claimants, determine its meaning. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 8:29 am by Andrew Delaney
First of all, the contract is vaguely titled, and the part about non-interference is sort of buried inside. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 1:42 pm by Giles Peaker
There was also the Simmons v Castle 10 per cent uplift on all the general damages of £965.36. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 2:33 am by INFORRM
  The question was whether in all the circumstances England was clearly or distinctly the appropriate forum for the trial and that the court ought in all the circumstances to exercise its discretion to permit service out of the jurisdiction. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:18 am by Julian Ku
  The U.S. and other South China Sea claimants would surely welcome such a move as more in compliance with international law. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 12:00 am by Pietro Franzina
Among the claimants, all of them of Romanian nationality, some were habitually resident in Italy, others in Romania. [read post]