Search for: "Born v. Born" Results 6161 - 6180 of 7,510
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2010, 6:09 am by Jacob Sapochnick
This interim memo is a response to the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Kazarian v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 12:02 am by Gilles Cuniberti
The English abstract reads: Last-born among European Union Private International Law, the « Rome I » Regulation establishes rules concerning the law applicable to contracts. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 1:48 pm by Mike
Bush, morons who'd be bankrupt had they not been born into the right families. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 11:58 am by Marta Requejo
  The facts of the case Ms Povse and Mr Alpago lived together as an unmarried couple in Vittorio Veneto, Italy, until the end of January 2008 with their daughter Sofia, born 6 December 2006. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 10:13 am by Adam Wagner
Patel, R (on the application of) v Lord Chancellor [2010] EWHC 2220 (Admin) (27 August 2010) – Read judgment The wife of the purported ringleader of the ’7/7? [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:03 pm by Jeffrey B. Gracer
The brief, submitted on behalf of the Tennessee Valley Authority (“TVA”), a defendant in the Second Circuit case, Connecticut v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 9:10 am by Lyle Denniston
U.S. (09-5801) — constitutionality of treating fathers differently from mothers in transferring their U.S. citizenship to a child born overseas  (J. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
A permanent Portuguese fort was established at Arguin in 1448, and the 1452 Dum Diversas papal bull of Pope Nicholas V specifically authorized Alfonso V of Portugal, …full and free permission to invade, search out, capture, and subjugate the Saracens and pagans and any other unbelievers and enemies of Christ wherever they may be… and to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 6:09 pm by legalinformatics
Here is the abstract: In Australia, trials conducted as ‘electronic trials’ have ordinarily run with the assistance of commercial service providers, with the associated costs being borne by the parties. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 1:18 pm by Lunn Law LLC
The Court of Appeals of Georgia (Second Division), in Williamson v. [read post]