Search for: "CHANCE v. STATE"
Results 6161 - 6180
of 12,120
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm
The best chance to save the petitioner was the brain damage, and the jury and state courts were not persuaded. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:08 am
Moore v British Waterways Board [2012] EWHC 182 (Ch) – read judgment From time to time, the courts are called upon to explain who holds the power to order people about, and why they have it. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Lane; and (2) whether the United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction over a state court determination of retroactivity of a case on collateral review, when a state has both adopted and applied Teague. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
United States. [read post]
11 May 2015, 9:01 pm
T.M. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 7:50 am
’” Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 3:46 pm
Chance Co., 357 F.3d 1270, 1275 (Fed. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 11:30 am
Articles IV and V oblige the U.S government and Soviet Union to destroy the missiles’ “launchers[,] support structures and support equipment . . . associated with such missiles and launchers. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 2:54 am
On February 20, 1905, the Supreme Court, by a 7-2 majority, said in Jacobson v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
Chances are very high that there's been an attempt to certify a class action. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:42 am
But the constitutionality of the program is raised as a separate question, in an appeal by Arizona state officials — Garriott v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 9:04 pm
As many as 1 in 3 people with a V. vulnificus infection die. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 12:19 pm
But not the United States. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm
To top it off, despite a second chance to reconsider its rulings – the court instead kept digging. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 7:44 am
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 7:25 pm
Further, the Supreme Court stated that “[g]overnmental or private policies are not contrary to the disparate-impact requirement unless they are artificial, arbitrary, and unnecessary barriers. [read post]
8 May 2020, 10:19 am
Tilkey v. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 7:48 am
The Supreme Court held in Lujan v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 9:27 am
Maloney v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Katfriend Nicoletta Epaminonda takes a loot at the Cypriot transposition of the Trade Mark Directive 2015/2436 and reflects on what the future might hold for trade marks in this Member State. [read post]
