Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 6161 - 6180 of 16,704
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2020, 2:38 pm by Giles Peaker
The Secretary of State for the Home Department v R (on the application of) Joint Council for The Welfare of Immigrants (2020) EWCA Civ 542 The Court of Appeal have their way with the judicial review of the ‘Right to Rent’ scheme. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:27 pm by Luke Rioux
The United States Supreme Court has ruled on two drug dog cases in the last few weeks: Florida v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:56 am by admin
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), finds no ineffectiveness by defense attorneys who fall asleep during the cross-examination of their client (Muniz v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 6:51 am by Howard M. Wasserman
Kagan pressed Huston on how this case implicates national security — Egbert checked the immigration status of one person and the case did not involve a cross-border shooting (as in Hernandez v. [read post]
Accordingly, without a complete rehearing before the (newly established) ISA, including the possibility of oral evidence and cross-examination of witnesses, Laws LJ considered that “at the very least the flavour and emphasis of those conclusions will remain important and influential”. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:06 pm
United States, 136 S. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:53 am by Alexandra Allan
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsuibishi UFJ Ltd v Sanko Mineral (The MV Sanko Mineral) [2014]EWHC 3927 (Admlty) Cargo Interests began proceedings in the U.S. against the Defendant former owner of the M/V SANKO MINERAL for breach of a contract of carriage. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:53 am by Alexandra Allan
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsuibishi UFJ Ltd v Sanko Mineral (The MV Sanko Mineral) [2014]EWHC 3927 (Admlty) Cargo Interests began proceedings in the U.S. against the Defendant former owner of the M/V SANKO MINERAL for breach of a contract of carriage. [read post]