Search for: "DOES I-X" Results 6161 - 6180 of 7,403
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2010, 3:58 pm by B.W. Barnett
  “I understand the co-defendant has been offered this (offer X.) [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 7:00 am by Michael L. Neff
”CT scans use high doses of radiation compared to traditional x-rays. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:37 am by Paul Maharg
  For instance the research tells us that feedback that informs students about their errors in general terms via lists or lectures doesn’t work to improve student performance; nor does deterrence (ie if you don't do X, you will suffer the consequences). [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 4:26 pm by Bridget Crawford
 Stabbing at an answer, I’d say that an article has more background (that not-so-useful-but-unfortunately-de-rigeur-and-too-long “Part I: Overview”/background/literature review) or more complex theoretical ambitions than an essay does. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 3:48 am by Jeff Foust
“This does not speak well of using our government as the vehicle for getting human beings into space. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 5:30 pm
If they wanted a referral I would be glad to assist, but I could not take either case. 1.06 does allow representation of conflicted parties if the parties are made aware and consent. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 10:38 pm by Gary L. Francione
This is a variant of the general argument that we hear all the time: “Group X does good things for animals so do not criticize what Group X does because it will harm their efforts to help animals. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 9:31 pm by MacIsaac
  His right ankle does not show evidence of significant injury. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:23 pm
  It's also hard to distinguish between two phenomena: A) Justice X changes her mind on some question because she observes that public attitudes have changed; versus B) Justice Y, as a participant in the same culture as the population as a whole, changes his mind at roughly the same time that the public does. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:03 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The identification of this effect however does not require any ingenuity. [2.5] Therefore, the use as defined in claim 1 in accordance with the auxiliary request does not involve an inventive step as required by A 56. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 11:55 pm
I took the EU member states, plus USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Switzerland, Iceland, Japan and South Korea. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 11:01 pm by charonqc
The minimum security should be full x-raying of each passenger and full internal cavity searches. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 5:13 pm by Jeff Foust
The X PRIZE Foundation also sees positives in the budget proposal. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 2:11 pm by Jon
Does that therefore mean that the basic method of operation of the law based in a logical fallacy? [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:57 am by Gary L. Francione
In sum, if X, Y, and Z are all viewed as morally undesirable, the choice to work on X does not convey the message that Y and Z are morally acceptable. [read post]