Search for: "English v. English"
Results 6161 - 6180
of 11,203
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2014, 6:43 am
Great White Shark Enterprises, Inc.. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 2:57 pm
Even if the Mathews v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 2:43 pm
California that Georgia v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 11:00 am
Flook, drew this notion in part from Neilson v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
This week, clicking the “Français” tab above will reveal the English translation. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 3:58 pm
Indeed, a Google Ngrams search through American English books reports “on the weekend” far head, while the British English search reports “at the weekend” being dominant. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 3:55 am
Thursday, March 6 5:00 pm – 6:30 pm Sullivan Hall, Room C5 The American Indian Law Journal Presents a Spring Panel reconciling Interests: A Focus on The Indian Child Welfare Act Beyond “Baby Veronica” The “Baby Veronica Case” or Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 4:08 pm
The decision of the European Court of Justice in Svensson v Retriever Sverige AB (Case C‑466/12, 13 February 2014) has established some important points about the legality of linking under EU copyright law: A clickable direct link to a copyright work made freely available on the internet with the authority of the copyright holder does not infringe. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 12:56 am
The issue of anonymity orders in defamation claims has also arisen recently in the English case of ZAM v CFW ([2013] EWHC 662 (QB)). [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:37 am
Dist. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:48 am
In Mayo v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
However, he managed to win his fair share of the legal arguments and even appeared successfully before the Supreme Court [ed. note: Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 12:34 am
The English law – in common with that in a number of other jurisdictions – prevents public bodies from suing for libel (see Derbyshire County Council v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 6:54 am
Upset by Zhu’s fate, this English-speaking Kat and his guesting Dutch-speaking Katfriend are minded to stop there. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 5:54 am
Interestingly, the European Court of Human Rights case-law is slowly but surely moving forward: I v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:00 am
The order was placed and paid for through the English website of the seller. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm
It doesn’t make the stop unlawful if there is a subsidiary purpose – “killing two birds with one stone” – but the permitted purpose must be the “true and dominant purpose behind the act” (R v Southwark Crown Court ex p. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 1:20 pm
British Columbia’s judges cannot preside over out-of-province hearings but may use video conferencing to connect with B.C. courtrooms from afar, under an appeal court ruling.Endean v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:51 am
See discussion in Krinsky v. [read post]
