Search for: "Givens Group, Inc."
Results 6161 - 6180
of 6,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2019, 10:34 am
Indiana, this Court concluded that a protester's statement that "we'll take the fucking street later" as police attempted to clear a crowd from a street was constitutionally protected: "Since the uncontroverted evidence showed that Hess's statement was not directed to any person or group of persons, it cannot be said that he was advocating, in the normal sense, any action. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 11:00 pm
BRAZIL The second round of voting in the Brazilian presidential elections took place on 30 October 2022. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:03 pm
Let me start by reminding you that my views are my own as a Commissioner and not necessarily those of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or my fellow Commissioners. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am
Dan AronowitzMany of you may have seen the February 5, 2024 Wall Street Journal article (here) describing the new lawsuit filed against Johnson & Johnson accusing the company of mismanaging its workers’ prescription-drug benefits. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 8:13 am
The language in Goodwin regarding the lower likelihood of vindictiveness in pretrial charging decisions did not establish “that such a presumption was warranted for all post-trial charging decision changes,” and given the harshness of imposing such a presumption, the court was unwilling to find that it applied here. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:22 am
Apparently, the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) has been studying the possible reasons why so few victims of foreclosure in 2009 and 2010 chose to submit their cases for review by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) as part of the regulator’s Independent Foreclosure Review process. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Amgen, Inc., No. 07-1999 "In an action against defendant charging fraudulent pricing of pharmaceutical drugs in violation of Wisconsin state law, an order remanding the case and sanctioning defendant is affirmed in part as to the remand order, but reversed as to the sanctions where: 1) the filing of a suit under the False Claims Act did not render this case removable; and 2) the paucity of appellate authority on the removability issue gave defendant a reasonable basis for removing the… [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc., 14-144 (involving a First Amendment challenge to license plate restrictions), and Bullard v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:57 pm
Universities are barred from restricting student speech based on the viewpoint of the speaker, even when it comes to student group access to funding programs or to classrooms. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Record Number of Black Candidates for Higher Offices Aim to Reshape U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm
[UPDATE May 21, 2012. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
October Term 2017’s last group of relists includes a few cases whose stay on the Supreme Court’s docket has been especially puzzling for me, so I’ll just note what they are. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:54 am
Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
This grouping has produced dramatic shifts in the Court’s Sixth Amendment jurisprudence relating to the jury trial right (which has significant effects on how prison sentences are determined) and a defendant’s right to confront witnesses against him. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
This body of law, however, is less well codified with respect to our current, novel type of armed conflict against armed groups such as al-Qaida and the Taliban. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:43 am
December 16, 2020 Clients, Friends, Associates: As we prepare for a new year, we also reflect on an eventful, sometimes chaotic, 2020, dominated by the emergence of the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”). [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
” The indictment and its accompanying “statement of facts” accuse Trump of orchestrating a “catch and kill” scheme with his fixer Michael Cohen, American Media, Inc. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Supreme Court overturned the physical presence standard established in two earlier cases, National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
Section 3 states: No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion… [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
The dissent agreed that “Bellas Hess was wrongly decided, for many of the reasons given by the Court,” but urged that any change to the physical [read post]
