Search for: "Husband v. Wife"
Results 6161 - 6180
of 6,703
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2008, 7:00 pm
Smoley v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 4:59 pm
O'Connell - "Frank O'Connell ("Husband") appeals the trial court's order dissolving his marriage to Jennifer O'Connell ("Wife"). [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 4:00 pm
In Norton v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 5:30 pm
The 4th District in The United Farm Family Mutual Insurance v. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 6:27 am
(People v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 4:29 am
The high court is scheduled to consider whether to take up the case, Dupuy v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 12:05 am
Lawrence and Wendelle Elsensohn, husband and wife, were both employed by the defendant Sheriff's Office. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 6:01 pm
The Fifth Circuit in Elsensohn v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:27 pm
John Cherry III (NFP), a 7-page, 2-1 opinion, Judge Kirsch writes:Marcy Jasmund Cherry ("Wife") appeals the trial court's division of marital property in her dissolution with John Cherry III ("Husband"). [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 4:41 pm
Plaintiffs-Appellants Bernard Francis Schultz and Elizabeth Mary Sabatine (hereinafter "the Schultzes"), husband and wife and residents of Hamilton County, Tennessee, filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 13 in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 4:41 pm
Plaintiffs-Appellants Bernard Francis Schultz and Elizabeth Mary Sabatine (hereinafter "the Schultzes"), husband and wife and residents of Hamilton County, Tennessee, filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 13 in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 10:45 pm
In the case of Bair v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 5:08 pm
Given the dearth of corroborating witness testimony and Wife's evasiveness, we find that the record simply does not support a finding that Husband threatened to kill Wife. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 12:40 pm
The ex-husband wanted to pay no alimony because the ex-wife was cohabiting with a man. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 3:27 am
This one is often known as the adverse testimony privilege, and is popularly known as the privilege which means "a wife can't be forced to testify against her husband" or vice versa.A recent decision from a federal district court in the Southern District of New York - U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:04 pm
In Thompson v. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 10:49 pm
Soulsbury v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:07 am
The New Jersey divorce judge had ordered the husband to pay his ex-wife 18 months of rehabilitative alimony. [read post]
25 May 2008, 8:02 pm
" " In holding the husband to the deal, the court seemingly disregards the fact that the alimony probably now puts the wife in a better cash position than the husband. [read post]
25 May 2008, 12:23 pm
The traditional loss of consortium claim of the English common law had only authorized a cause of action for a husband whose wife was injured, but Florida courts had expanded it, in line with the developing law of the marital relationship recognizing men and women as equal partners, to allow women to bring a loss of consortium claim for injury to their husbands. [read post]
