Search for: "Kennedy v. State" Results 6161 - 6180 of 8,225
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2020, 2:35 am by Léon Dijkman
For instance, in C-484/14 McFadden, the CJEU sought a remedy that would least infringe the defendant's rights, and in 26839/05 Kennedy v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
Kennedy concurred with the Court’s answers to the federal court’s questions and with the legal reasoning related to the lease expiration issue. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:28 am by Lyle Denniston
The most intriguing, as the Court heard the case of Zivotofsky v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 6:17 pm by Alan Rozenshtein
But he nevertheless identified a number of situations in which a party would have standing to attack the FAA: for example, if the government chose to use FAA-derived information in a judicial or administrative proceeding (as occurred in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:40 am by Tiffany Blofield
  The case involving the REDSKINS mark is currently on hold until the United States Supreme Court decides the In re Tam case. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
It stated all the dosages correctly as well as the consequences of overdose. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for the local government in Town of Greece v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 3:29 pm
Freedus responded by referring to a Fifth Circuit case (United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm
Much attention has been directed at the coercion issue as presented by Justice Kennedy at oral argument. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in King v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 10:15 am
S., at 580 (Kennedy, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment). [read post]
21 May 2012, 9:43 am by Ilya Somin
In the lawsuit titled United States of America v. 434 Main Street, Tewksbury, Massachusetts, the government is suing an inanimate object, the motel Caswell’s father built in 1955. [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:21 am by Steve Vladeck
But those issues simply pale in comparison to the problems with the bill as currently drafted.Update: Here is a link to the bill.Update II: Because I couldn't resist, here is the Supreme Court from Kennedy v. [read post]