Search for: "Kennedy v. State"
Results 6161 - 6180
of 8,225
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2010, 2:08 pm
It concerns the respect that federal courts owe the States and the States' procedural rules when reviewing the claims of state prisoners in federal habeas corpus.Coleman's lawyer blew a deadline in the Virginia Supreme Court, and as a result, O'Connor (joined by Rehnquist, White, Scalia, Kennedy, and Souter) determined that Coleman had forfeited his right to have federal courts review his federal constitutional claims. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 12:44 pm
The reasoning of these decisions varied at times, but the theme was consistent and widely understood that "a series of steps for conducting business could not be patented" (at pages 26-27 of his decision Justice Stevens cited several such cases including US Credit Sys Co v American Credit Indem Co (1893), Hotel Security Checking Co v Lorraine Co (1908), Loew's Drive-In Theatres, Inc v Park-In Theatres, Inc (1949)). [read post]
Letter from AmeriKat I: Bilski, Baby! (Justice Stevens -On the Majority's musings and UK patent law)
18 Jul 2010, 11:41 am
A couple of weeks ago, the AmeriKat wrote about Justice Kennedy's majority opinion in the much-awaited Supreme Court case of Bilski v Kappos. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
KENNEDY v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 4:44 pm
Kennedy, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 8:12 am
Following Tuesday’s Second Circuit decision in Fox v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 5:21 pm
Schreiner said the Court had “launched the United States Patent System into the Information Age with the Bilski v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
Kennedy v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 9:47 am
The Supreme Court's long-awaited decision in Bilski v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:42 am
Arizona in light of the Court’s recent decision in Berghuis v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm
Texas’s highest criminal court, the Court of Criminal Appeals, has held, in Stearnes v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 6:52 am
In April 2009, the Court issued a five-to-four opinion in FCC v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:50 am
If Kennedy doesn't want to commit himself to holding that the Constitution requires same-sex marriage everywhere in the United States, he may not be a fifth vote to strike down DOMA.The elephant in the room, of course, is the Perry v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 2:14 am
In eBay v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:03 am
Inasmuch as an accord and satisfaction constitutes a contract, it must be shown that the parties set forth the essential elements thereof and had a meeting of the minds to resolve the disputed claim (see Sorrye v Kennedy, 267 AD2d 587, 589 [1999]; Altamuro v Capoccetta, 212 AD2d at 905). [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:11 pm
Evans and Lawrence v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:06 pm
(Starting with Bush v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:46 am
Believe it or not, there's a practical lesson to be learned from the paradox in McDonald v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:15 am
Virginia in 1967, when only 17 states still banned interracial marriage; or Lawrence v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am
CAFC: Bilski V. [read post]
