Search for: "Likely v. State"
Results 6161 - 6180
of 82,323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2012, 12:22 pm
However, like the Vo court, the state court judge effectively gave no deference to the plaintiff's allegations, which seems like it could be a problem if subsequently challenged. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Johnson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 1:01 am
Supreme Court handed down its decision on the case McCleskey v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:07 am
First, the federal government generally cannot be sued without Congress’s consent – which it did not provide for a case like this one. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:20 am
In his recent Opinion and Order in the Erie County premises liability case of Skalos v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 3:30 am
Joseph Slater Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:00 am
But for better or worse, the world is not necessarily like that. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
His calls for re-examining Times v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 5:21 pm
As such, in accordance with the Supreme Court of the United States' holding in New Process Steel v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:39 am
Hopefully, this will give pause to those, like Mr. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 10:15 am
McCormick v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am
In a 46-page majority opinion written by Justice Chin and joined by four other justices, punctuated by an 18-page concurring opinion (by Justice Liu, joined by Justice Werdegar) which reads like a dissent, the California Supreme Court reversed the First District Court of Appeal’s judgment in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 7:35 am
Since he was aged 19, in principle AP qualified for leave to remain under rule 276ADE(1)(v) and it was thus possible to dispose of the appeal by agreement failing which it fell to be considered in accordance with the law stated in the court’s judgment without passing an order. [read post]
10 Apr 2025, 6:49 am
Here are the materials in Town of Southampton v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 11:11 pm
In NC Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 8:05 am
Takings cases like Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:07 am
According to Lady Hale, failing to exempt A from the “bedroom tax” was discriminatory “in the sense described in Thlimmenos v Greece: treating her like any other single parent with one child when in fact she ought to be treated differently” (at [75]). [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 6:04 am
State ex rel. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:15 am
"] Download Turner v Rogers UPDATE: Looks like Concurring Opinion's symposium on the case has already begun. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am
” Following mid-2000s cases like Lamparello and Lucas Nursery, we rarely see such unforgiving anti-griper opinions that twist the Lanham Act to cover circumstances it was never designed to cover. [read post]
