Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 6161 - 6180 of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2010, 10:09 pm
The IPKat's post on Friday ("When 'genuine' isn't genuine", here) has attracted a lot of interest. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 10:18 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) There’s been some recent buzz about this court decision, In the Matter of C (Romford County Ct. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:00 am by Cameron Hutchison
If students submit below average work, instructors should not be forced to give a B. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 3:37 am
William T., 30, (hereinafter, the "Defendant") was convicted last Monday in New Bedford Superior Court on various Massachusetts drug charges, such as trafficking Class B drugs over 100 grams, trafficking Class B drugs over 14 grams and possession of marijuana to distribute, as well as possession of an illegal firearm, unlawful possession of ammunition and unlawful possession of a large capacity feeding device after pleading guilty. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 9:04 pm
If you don’t manage your practice, ED doesn’t matter because you won’t HAVE a practice to litigate from. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Examine how things went when judges used Theory A, then how they went when they used Theory B. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:01 am by Chimène Keitner
Rather than definitively endorsing the Second Circuit’s tenuous approach, Kennedy finds “sufficient doubt on the point” to pass the entire issue to Congress (for reasons he elaborates on behalf of the majority in Part II-B-1). [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm
  As an economic matter, you didn't really "make" any money in 2018, since you spent $25,000 and made $25,000. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm by Brian A. Lebrecht
  While that wasn’t the issue before the Court, it is a reasonable inference based on the language in the Court’s opinion. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm by Brian A. Lebrecht
  While that wasn’t the issue before the Court, it is a reasonable inference based on the language in the Court’s opinion. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:45 pm
I've done the analysis about whether a company could have an obligation to disclose health problems of its CEO and I normally would have agreed with your suggestion that Item 5.02(b) (retirement, resignation or termination) might be triggered if a CEO became so debilitated that he wasn't truly functioning in that position. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:31 am
The company offered to reimburse the costs of the diagnosis in return for her silence on the matter. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 11:06 am
Moreover, it seems unfair if Defendant A gets convicted while Defendant B is acquitted after committing exactly the same offense, merely because B was lucky enough to get a jury that disapproves of the underlying law. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 7:14 am by Christopher Hoffmann
The golden rule here, no matter how smart or advanced the calculator is, is that it can only provide an estimate. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:07 am by Eugene Volokh
Further, Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure continues to apply, and the Court will continue to construe all filings as a certification, by the person signing the filed document and after reasonable inquiry, of the matters set forth in the rule, including but not limited to those in Rule 11(b)(2). [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Betty Lupinacci
Most filing instructions, no matter what the jurisdiction or publisher, are fairly straight forward. [read post]