Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 6161 - 6180
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Last week marked the 60th anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am
Milwaukeeans had to wait until December 12 to learn that the United States Supreme Court had denied the state’s petition for certiorari. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 3:17 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) United States US Patents A trio of post-Bilski cases fail to clearly define the meaning of ‘abstract’ (Electronic Frontier Foundation) Google calls on Big Blue again; SEC filing reveals speed of Motorola patent due diligence (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Computer programs and patentable subject matter: Ultramercial, LLC v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:42 am
” First, in the 1929 case United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 8:34 am
Most interesting here is the way in which the reconstitution of state borders in the wake of COVID, non-state collectives now seek the authority to both mark territory and to police those borders against outsiders. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:15 am
In the case of Barach v University of New South Wales [2011] NSWSC 431 the Supreme Court of New South Wales gave the claimant permission to serve libel proceedings on a defendant in the United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:20 pm
Intellectual Property Office (IPO) patent examiner Nigel Hanley opened the proceedings with a concise account of how the IPO's version of Peer-to-Patent (P2P) was intended to work; UCL-and-IPKat Matt Fisher then gave a candid account of the P2P experiences of the United States and Australia. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
Saudi Arabian Oil Co.Docket: 10-1393Issue(s): (1) Whether the political question doctrine deprives the federal courts of jurisdiction to adjudicate a Sherman Act and Clayton Act damage case against both private and state-owned businesses operating in the United States; and (2) whether the act of state doctrine bars antitrust claims against defendants whose conduct was commercial, and where it came to fruition and had its effect in the United… [read post]
29 May 2009, 3:00 am
– Pay attention to what your distributors/dealers are doing in China (China Hearsay) BSA: Software piracy rate down to 80% in China (S&F) Microsoft teams with City of Hangzhou to fight piracy (S&F) Denmark Maritime and Commercial Court upholds Jetmobile’s IP rights in software case (International Law Office) Europe L’Oreal v eBay: European courts rule eBay not liable for sales of counterfeit goods (IP Osgoode)… [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm
On 21 April 2022, the United States, Canada, Japan, Singapore, the Philippines, the Republic of Korea and Chinese Taipei published a declaration establishing the Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules Forum. [read post]
11 May 2025, 8:58 am
Warrington's team argued both that the President was not an "Officer of the United States" and did not hold an "Office under the United States. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 3:52 pm
In Securities & Exchange Commission v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:44 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm
Cir. 1973) (holding that Section 6(g) “empowered [the FTC] to promulgate substantive rules of business conduct”); United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:45 am
" Laird v. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 2:28 pm
The judgment in Case C-244/06 Dynamic Medien Vertriebs GmbH v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
In United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 7:02 am
United States and Black v. [read post]
