Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 6161 - 6180 of 16,584
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm by Morgan Weiland
Andersen Jones, RonNell, What the Supreme Court Thinks of the Press and Why It Matters, 66 Ala. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:13 am by Jim Sedor
Council Member Cannot Be Tracked to Source” by Aaron Davis for Washington Post Ethics “With Trump Appointees, a Raft of Potential Conflicts and ‘No Transparency’” by Eric Lipton, Ben Protess, and Andrew Lehren for New York Times Alabama: “Judicial Ethics Complaint Filed Against Judge Who Ordered Halt to Bentley Impeachment Hearing” by Kent Faulk for AL.com California: “Oakland Ethics Panel Slams Lax Oversight of Free Warriors, Raiders and A’s… [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 7:02 am by Dan Harris
” A year or two after the fall of Soviet communism, I was involved in a matter where an investor put $250,000 into a Russian joint venture. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 5:11 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The person who receives the dividend is the person responsible for paying the tax on the dividend: it doesn’t matter who owns the stock. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 5:04 am by SHG
No, this doesn’t come from an advertisement of the Bite Mark Analysts Association of America. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
Can you use the Pope's image on T-shirts and gadgets? [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm by Victoria Kwan
“At my workplace, collegiality really matters,” Ginsburg told the audience. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 2:26 am
However, the court disagreed, stating that the design must be of a quality permitting all the details of the matter for which protection is sought to be clearly distinguished.Photo credit:  Steven Tan [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 11:53 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
And there’s probably no better example of how seriously the IRS takes that charge than Trump’s returns: no matter how loudly an audience has clamored for those returns, no real details have been disclosed (it’s worth noting that the partial return revealed on Maddow’s show was marked “Client Copy” which means it did not come from IRS). [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:49 am by Florian Mueller
The fact that certain amici who supported Samsung on design patents aren't on board this time doesn't mean that the three issues raised last months aren't also certworthy in their own ways and their own right.In this post I want to focus on what the amicus briefs indicate with respect to certworthiness. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:00 am by Kenneth Anderson
It’s a little like housing prices—the fact that they hadn’t declined on the national level for more than 50 years before 2006 didn’t mean they couldn’t decline. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 8:00 am by Orin Kerr
Ct. at 1415 [emphasis added; quotation marks omitted], it is axiomatic that a homeowner may take actions to revoke or otherwise limit that invitation or license. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 3:38 am
Klickitat Valley Chianina, LLC, Serial No. 76715490 (March 16, 2017) [not precedential] (opinion by Judge Shaw).The Board observed that "more evidence is required where a mark is so highly descriptive that purchasers seeing the matter in relation to the named good would be less likely to believe that it indicates source in any one party. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 1:16 am
”They are talking about IPKats in Asian...WIPO's statistics for 2016: Asia continues to roar Mark Schweizer is adapting (into Asian style?) [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 10:24 am by Theresa Gabaldon
It would certainly complicate matters if they were exempt from Secti [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 9:55 am by J. Dana Stuster
“This will continue to happen because the state is not interested in protecting Christians, or anyone else for that matter. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 11:56 am by Annemarie Bridy
In that context, the mark seems to be a tacit (thought not explicit) assertion of copyright. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:58 am by Matthew Dresden
It doesn’t matter that the pending application is for a mark identical to your existing U.S. trademark registration. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 1:15 am
Here it is likely that the provisions invoked would be those relating to trade mark protection, and also unfair competition within Article 2598 of the Italian civil code. [read post]