Search for: "Roll v. Roll"
Results 6161 - 6180
of 6,812
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2009, 5:00 am
In San Antonio Fire & Policy v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 5:25 am
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Matter of Hizbullahankhamon v Fischer [read post]
28 May 2009, 9:22 pm
In today’s case (Pett v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:05 pm
But I have to say a few things about the First Circuit’s thoughtful and eminently humane ruling in Taing v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 9:56 pm
The case cite is Sportsfragrance, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 10:33 am
Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 2:01 am
Rolls Royce plc v Unite the Union Court of Appeal “Length of service was a lawful criterion for selection for redundancy since it achieved a legitimate aim by a proportionate means. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 pm
Evans, to overturn Bowers v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 11:42 am
The Curious Case of Levy v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 10:11 am
So at least she can win when the other side rolls over. [read post]
21 May 2009, 1:02 am
The court of appeals tethers this holding to Klapesky v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 7:00 am
" Just a suggestion.Oops, here comes another universally applied rule that is routinely ignored:Downright Engineering v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 3:58 am
State v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 3:07 am
Rolls Royce plc v Unite the Union [2009] EWCA Civ 387 “A length of service criterion within the selection matrix for redundancy selection, contained in collective agreements between a company and a workers' union, was not in breach of the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006, in that the inclusion of the criterion was a ‘proportionate means [...] [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:53 pm
V.) was an incredible experience. [read post]
17 May 2009, 1:43 pm
Some were here during years that simply rolled into the next without much notice or fanfare - periods of relative peace and prosperity that required little by way of sacrifice or struggle. [read post]
17 May 2009, 5:47 am
HHJ Redgrave distinguished Harvey v Bamforth on the basis that Ms Rollings had still not complied with s213(6)(a). [read post]
16 May 2009, 4:06 am
John Hospital and Medical Center sued over elimination of program that paid staff for unused sick days when they retired or resignedMO> DECIDED · Plaintiffs lose bid to return suit to state court; fed court will hear age/gender discrim suit by 3 fem senior on-air-personalities vs KMBC-TV> FILED · Ex-65yo Mid-Missouri Bank Exec sues for age/discharge discrim; sez bank has de facto policy of favoring younger employees> NEWS… [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:14 am
Much of this furor stems from the outrageous decision issued by the Supreme Court in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 2:00 am
Perhaps your insurance company should be paying for the damages and your counsel (soon to be decided in Builders Mutual v. [read post]
