Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 6161 - 6180
of 17,253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2016, 12:01 am
After the ballots were counted in the 2000 presidential election, Al Gore was leading George W. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 2:41 am
Additional Resources: Suarez v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 9:21 am
In Salman v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:29 pm
On the other hand, State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:29 pm
On the other hand, State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:56 am
Citing the Bush v Gore SCOTUS decision, Judge Goldsmith found that Stein had demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits of their claim that further delay of the voter re-count would violate her fundamental constitutional right to a presidential vote under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:34 am
And if there was any more irony to be found in Greenhouse’s double secret polemic, it’s in her use of the mean ol’ Fifth Circuit’s Buck v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 9:15 am
Facts: This case (United States of America v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 9:00 am
Manago v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 9:00 am
Manago v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:31 pm
by Dennis Crouch Life Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:15 pm
In State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:15 pm
In State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 10:35 am
It has taken the Supreme Court of the United States less than two months since a mid-October hearing and less than ten pages (counting only the opinion per se, not the two-page syllabus) to determine and explain that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit got the law on design patent damages fundamentally wrong. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:33 am
Justice Black’s opinion in Afroyim v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 10:00 pm
The Hepatitis A outbreak count was at 292 and holding, as of the state health department’s Nov. 30 update. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm
Mission Bay Alliance, et al. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 11:29 am
Facts: This case (Joan Cravens Construction, Inc. et al v. [read post]