Search for: "Smith, Appeal of" Results 6161 - 6180 of 10,323
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2009, 3:05 am
Smith and Wall LLJ agreed with Pill LJ. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 4:49 pm
Smith case for further insights into the Court's practice of vacating lower court judgments that, by happenstance, are moot.] [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Smith: The justices must decide what happens when the government fabricates evidence. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 4:49 pm
Smith case for further insights into the Court's practice of vacating lower court judgments that, by happenstance, are moot.] [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:55 pm by Dan Gauss
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a disappointing but fortunately narrow decision in a case involving warrantless tracking of a vehicle with a GPS device. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:45 am by Stephen Jenei
The combined notice of appeal and appeal brief cost would be lowered from its current level of $1,240 to $1,000. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 3:06 pm
  Specifically at issue in the appeal by a defeated state supreme court candidate, W. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 10:00 am by Andrew Hamm
Smith & Nephew Inc. 19-1458Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Pimlico Plumbers Ltd & Anor v Smith, heard 20-21 Feb 2018. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 5:17 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Trump claims ‘absolute’ immunity Trump’s appeal for immunity from special counsel Jack Smith’s election subversion charges landed at the Supreme Court late in the term and instantly overshadowed most of the docket. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 12:17 am
So Judge Smith's test would get this one wrong. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 8:33 am
No appeal was taken from the order granting the sentence reduction. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm by Martin George
Burkhard Hess is Professor at the University of Heidelberg and judge at the Court of Appeals in Karlsruhe. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
In this instance Mr Trkulja appealed to the High Court seeking to overturn the Court of Appeal’s findings, as upheld by the Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Smith , No. 08-1477 Sentence for distribution of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant defendant a continuance for another chance to present expert testimony; 2) the district court correctly applied 18 U.S.C. sec. 3553 (a) when sentencing defendant, and did not fail to adequately address the factors set forth in the statute; and 3) there is no evidence that the district court's tangential statements about early… [read post]