Search for: "State v. Country" Results 6161 - 6180 of 26,698
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2015, 4:53 am
This is quite different from the passport provision recently held unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 1:27 pm by Bexis
The First Circuit decided Bartlett v. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:15 am by Hutko
Well, it seems that at least in one country the Bavarian state had difficulties to convince the judges of its copyright ownership. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:15 am by Hutko
Well, it seems that at least in one country the Bavarian state had difficulties to convince the judges of its copyright ownership. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:39 am by John Elwood
Obama (relisted after 3/18 Conference) Docket: 10-775 Issue(s): Whether petitioners have a habeas corpus right to be brought into the United States and released, outside the framework of the fed­eral immigration laws and in contravention of specific statutory restrictions on their transfer to the United States, when they have been granted habeas corpus re­lief and received appropriate offers of resettlement from two different countries but have declined to accept… [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 12:22 pm by Amy Howe
ShareLess than two years ago, the Supreme Court ruled in McGirt v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 3:43 am by Alessandro Cerri
It is also questionable whether the Court was correct in stating that consumer perception will only be relevant in certain circumstances, when the CJEU stated at least twice in Louboutin (at least in the English translation – see paras 43 and 48) that it was ‘necessary’, in order to determine whether a marketplace operator makes ‘use’ of a sign, to assess consumer perception. [read post]
11 May 2010, 2:59 am
Last week, in the wake of the State Supreme Court's ruling in Brayton et al. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 1:10 pm by Peter Margulies
” That observation dovetails with the Court’s holding in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:37 am
The issue was somewhat unsettled until fairly recently when the Supreme Court of the United States decided, in the case of Atlantic Sounding Co., v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 9:14 am
Which leads me to wonder who from The Old Country (read: England) drafted the opinion, which in multiple places refers to various two- and four-"storey" buildings. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
     On March 31, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States denied certiorari in Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
Meade J has also stated that any decision the court makes on the FRAND royalty amount the iPhone maker must pay would apply worldwide, not just to its UK sales (in line with the UK Supreme Court decision last year in Unwired Planet v Huawei). [read post]