Search for: "State v. E. E. B." Results 6161 - 6180 of 10,086
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2020, 12:01 am by Tessa Shepperson
  We start with an important legal case Trecarrel v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 12:01 am by Tessa Shepperson
  We start with an important legal case Trecarrel v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 8:51 am
§ 552(b)(7)(F), exempts from mandatory disclosure photographic records concerning allegations of abuse and mistreatment of detainees in United States custody when the government has demonstrated that the disclosure of those photographs could reasonably be expected to endanger the lives or physical safety of United States military and civilian personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
The relevant date for construing the patent claims is either: a) The date of issuance of the patent, for patents applied for before October 1, 1989; or b) the date of publication of the patent application, for patents applied for on or after October 1, 1989 (Chapter 6.7.1.1). [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 3:30 am by Peter Mahler
” In his Commentaries, Blackstone stated, “[sale] or exchange is a tran[s]mutation of property from one man to another, in con[s]ideration of [s]ome recompen[s]e in value: for there is no [s]ale without a recompen[s]e; there mu[s]t be quid pro quo. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 11:18 am by Rick
” The text doesn’t state that, but that’s the argument. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am by Christa Culver
Diamond, et al.Amicus brief for Professor Jeffrey B. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:08 pm by Betsy McKenzie
They had to send an e-mail that not only stated their interest but included the answer to 2 questions: a) What would you like to tell legal publishers about your institutions? [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed in relevant part, rejecting the states’ nondelegation challenge; the court also concluded other claims were time-barred because the states acted more than a decade after CMS promulgated the rule. [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:18 pm
Deductibles above $1,000.00 may be offered, subject to the approval of the Commissioner;(C) Deductible amounts shown in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of this paragraph may not be reduced below $250.00;(D) Deductible amounts shown in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of this paragraph shall be made available at a reduced premium; and(E) Where an insurer has combined into one single limit the coverages required under paragraph (1) of this subsection, any deductible selected under… [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Polk, No. 072425 Sentence of fifteen years and eight months incarceration for attempting to produce child pornography is affirmed where: 1) there was no gross disproportionality between the fifteen-year mandatory minimum term of imprisonment established by 18 U.S.C. section 2251(e) and the offense of which the defendant was convicted; and 2) the defendant's Eighth Amendment challenge failed. [read post]