Search for: "State v. Field"
Results 6161 - 6180
of 12,942
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2015, 5:03 am
That means that other parties will not be hindered in developing technologies which also make use of the same judicial exception.Ariosa Diagnostics v SequenomAriosa Diagnostics, Inc. v Sequenom, Inc., No. 2014-1139 (Fed. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:33 am
COLI O157:H7 BACTERIA Sources, Characteristics, and Identification E. coli O157:H7 is one of hundreds of strains of the bacterium Escherichia coli.[1] Most strains of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and animals.[2] The E. coli bacterium is among the most extensively studied microorganism.[3] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific markers found on its surface and distinguishes it from other… [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 1:21 am
Similarly, in State of Karnataka v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm
McClue v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
These are especially common in the field of drugs. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 1:51 pm
For more information, click on the links: Journal Issue Deadline Legal Bloc Journal v. 1, no. 5 Sept. 25, 2015 Socio-Legal Review (National Law School of India University) v. 12 Nov. 1, 2015 Law Mantra Online Journal v. 3, no. 1 Sept. 10, 2015 International Journal of Legal Developments and Allied Issues; Call for papers on Legal Bloc v. 1, no. 3 Aug. 31, 2015 Libertatem Magazine 8th issue Aug. 25, 2015 International Review of Human Rights Law… [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 5:46 am
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 5:46 am
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 12:00 am
On 16 July 2015, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) rendered its judgment in the case of A v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 5:33 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:57 pm
In Cady v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 9:55 am
And I guess a more articulate way of thinking about it is that Brady v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 11:30 am
Doe v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 8:36 am
Copyright History Shyam Balganesh University of Pennsylvania Law School The Questionable Origins of the Copyright Infringement Analysis Jerome Frank’s infamous/canonical © infringement test from Arnstein v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in TN, MA and AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 40, in which the Court held that a breach of the family tracing duty in Regulation 6 of the Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2005 does not affect the rule in Ravichandran requiring asylum applications to be decided on the facts existing at the date of decision. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 3:15 pm
In the case of Murray v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:42 am
In Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
In addition to the key case of Rottmann v Freistaat Bayern [2010] ECR I-1449 numerous other authorities such as Kaur [2001] All ER (EC) 250, McCarthy [2011] All ER (EC) 729 Zambrano [2011] ECR I-1177 and Dereci [2011] ECR I-11315 were analysed and applied to his case. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 7:52 am
Fitness v. [read post]
