Search for: "State v. Harding"
Results 6161 - 6180
of 16,071
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2018, 3:13 pm
Co. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 2:29 am
Henry, Montclair State University. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:52 am
The basis on which equity grants relief from the strict enforcement of a forfeiture is that it regards the forfeiture as only a security for the performance of an underlying obligation: see Shiloh Spinners Ltd v Harding (1973) AC 691, 723-724 per Lord Wilberforce, recently affirmed by this court in Vauxhall Motors Ltd (formerly General Motors UK Ltd) v Manchester Ship Canal Co Ltd (2019) UKSC 46; (2020) AC 1161, para 17. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 6:42 pm
Abbasi and Hernandez v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 8:34 am
That decision, in the case of United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:05 pm
United States 14-510Issue: Whether the D.C. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:52 am
The seminal decision, Petruis v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:37 am
’ (United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:44 pm
Justice Rothstein stated as follows in the CBC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:06 pm
State of Rajasthan, AIR 1956 SC 54, that no hard and fast rule can be laid down as to what inference should be drawn from certain circumstances.7.3. [read post]
20 May 2020, 4:21 pm
The original two judgments can be found here : A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors [2020] EWFC 38 (11 May 2020) (Main judgment) A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors [2020] EWHC 1162 (Fam) (11 May 2020 (Original decision to anonymise) The latest judgment can be found here : PA Media Group v London Borough of Haringey & Ors [2020] EWHC 1282 (Fam) (20 May 2020) You can read Louise Tickle’s tweet thread here : Our team member @louisetickle is a… [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 2:27 pm
I just ran across a case that dealt with this question in an unusual context — where the defendant’s alibi involved his supposedly returning a certain book to the library, State v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 5:53 am
United States suffers from shallow reasoning, lack of historical support, and distortion of legal precedent. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:30 pm
Accord Phelps v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:18 am
In relation to the first issue, he began by noting that the only basis upon which it could be said that the information intercepted from the claimants’ phones constituted ‘intellectual property’ as defined in section 72(5) was if it was ‘technical or commercial information or other intellectual property’. [22] Lord Neuberger rejected the argument put forward by the Secretary of State (as an interested party) that “commercial information” should be… [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:21 am
In an op-ed for The San Diego Union-Tribune, Denise Harle maintains that “all Americans should consider it great news that the Supreme Court is taking a hard look at the Reproductive FACT Act” in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 9:59 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 7:00 am
In Railroad Commission Of Texas v. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 12:15 pm
Brightman v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 2:46 pm
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
