Search for: "State v. Law" Results 6161 - 6180 of 155,311
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm by David Super
  In many states, popular election of delegates would require changing state law. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The post Court Upholds Warrantless Blood Test in Mitchell v Wisconsin appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:48 am
The Supreme Court yesterday, as expected, granted certiorari to McDonald v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 3:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The court explained that the "express purpose of Labor Law §740 is to protect public health and safety" and as it stated in Rosario v Port Auth. of N.Y. and N.J., 179 AD3d 516, "[t]he Compact Clause of the United Stated Constitution is not implicated by the application of such New York workplace safety statutes to [a] Port Authority work site located in New York. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 3:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The court explained that the "express purpose of Labor Law §740 is to protect public health and safety" and as it stated in Rosario v Port Auth. of N.Y. and N.J., 179 AD3d 516, "[t]he Compact Clause of the United Stated Constitution is not implicated by the application of such New York workplace safety statutes to [a] Port Authority work site located in New York. [read post]
Following Dobbs, many U.S. employers are navigating new state laws and considering a host of new legal issues as they ensure employee access to reproductive health care. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal has handed down judgment in Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599, a decision with significant implications for data protection law and practice. [read post]
8 May 2011, 8:42 am by Eugene R. Fidell
I am satisfied that Khadr's detention by the ISI was both arbitrary and illegal, according to the law of Pakistan. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 5:43 am by Gerard Magliocca
Last week the Fifth Circuit issued United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:16 am by The Federalist Society
The first is whether a bankruptcy court has power under Article I of the Constitution to determine, where an issue of state property law is involved, that property in the debtor’s possession belongs to the bankruptcy estate. [read post]