Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 6161 - 6180
of 29,602
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2020, 3:48 am
[¶] No actual corporate benefit has been stated and there is no evidence that proper judgment was exercised either. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:03 pm
The majority’s rule in Seila Law v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:41 pm
There was a twist in the plan. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:57 pm
As a result, on May 27, 2020, the Secretary of State announced that the PRC had fundamentally undermined Hong Kong’s autonomy and certified and reported to the Congress, pursuant to sections 205 and 301 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, as amended, respectively, that Hong Kong no longer warrants treatment under United States law in the same manner as United States laws were applied to Hong Kong before July 1, 1997. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
At that time Colorado had two strong Defense of Marriage provisions, one in the Constitution and the other statutory, not only barring the celebration of same-sex marriages in the state but denying in-state recognition to valid out-of-state same-sex marriages.[4] The federal government had its own DOMA.[5] But Massachusetts had recognized same-sex marriage.[6]Phillips met with them personally and, when he heard that the cake was intended as a celebration… [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 1:01 pm
Dep’t of Labor v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 10:46 am
Ass’n of United States, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:43 am
Circuit’s recent decision in Hoopa Valley Tribe v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
The Unnecessary Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2020).Caroline Mala Corbin In his new book, Gay Rights v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:08 am
To state a cause of action for legal malpractice, the plaintiff must allege that “the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession,” and that the “breach of this duty proximately caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007], quoting McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295,… [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 5:58 am
The agreement was clearly stated not to be an employment agreement. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
At the federal level, the House Committee on Transportation stated long haul GHG emissions accounts for 24 percent of total GHG emissions and a plan to decarbonize this industry supports statewide RPS planning as well as reduces nationwide climate concerns. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this series, I explained why last week’s opinions in Chiafalo v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
There had been some improvement in coverage in the two decades before the ACA was passed due to state laws mandating certain benefits in insurance plans. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 8:10 am
The government referenced Vasquez v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:43 am
Almost every state has at least one 529 plan. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:43 am
Almost every state has at least one 529 plan. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 10:05 pm
State, 781 A.2d 913 (Md. 2001), so maybe it's time for me to write another one. [read post]
