Search for: "State v. Saide"
Results 6161 - 6180
of 57,124
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2022, 8:54 am
Senator to the dishonest former governor of the state. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 8:25 am
It was held that the previous judge was correct in stating that dishonesty could not properly be alleged by adding the knowledge of one innocent person to another (citing Armstrong v Strain [1952] 1 K.B 232 and Greenridge Luton One Ltd v Kempton Investments Ltd [2016] EWHC 91 (Ch)). [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 7:36 am
To bypass the highly relevant Herbert v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:27 am
Even though he said he views increased funding for psychedelic research by the National Institutes of Health as “exciting,” in the long term, Haskell-Hoehl favors federal policy modeled after state legalization statutes, such as Oregon’s. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:17 am
But in 1996, Congress went even further, enacting the AEDPA, which said the habeas petition cannot be granted unless the state court trial error violated clearly-established Supreme Court precedent, was an unreasonable application of Supreme Court precedent, or was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:00 am
Circuit’s 1973 ruling in National Petroleum Refiners Association v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 5:40 am
People v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:22 am
“As in any situation where armed forces are used, everything will end with a treaty,” Lavrov said in an interview with state television. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:15 am
As a result, Poland’s action should fail and Article 17 be upheld.The judgment’s implicationsToday’s ruling will have a vast impact, both with regard to the application of already existing national transpositions of the DSM Directive and the transposition thereof by the remaining Member States (MS). [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 2:28 am
Haier application of Huawei v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm
United States Postal Service, the D.C. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
The Court seemed to hold that in 1962, when it ruled in Engel v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:01 pm
In Kennedy v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 1:39 pm
The company’s CEO also said that the company did not have any confidence when the previously anticipated revenues would actually come in. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 12:55 pm
United States cases and its more recent plurality opinion in Chavez v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:33 am
In D.N. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Further, said the Appellate Division, in determining whether a challenged statement is opinion or fact, the factors to be considered by courts are: "(1) whether the specific language at issue has a precise, readily understood meaning; "(2) whether the statements are capable of being proven true or false; and "(3) whether either the full context of the communication in which the statement appears or the broader social context and surrounding circumstances are such as to… [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Further, said the Appellate Division, in determining whether a challenged statement is opinion or fact, the factors to be considered by courts are: "(1) whether the specific language at issue has a precise, readily understood meaning; "(2) whether the statements are capable of being proven true or false; and "(3) whether either the full context of the communication in which the statement appears or the broader social context and surrounding circumstances are such as to… [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
What role do state legislators or state courts play? [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:32 am
His decision can not be said to have been uninformed or based on faulty advice. [read post]
