Search for: "State v. Self"
Results 6161 - 6180
of 14,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2007, 11:57 pm
SC06-2391 IAN DECO LIGHTBOURNE,Petitioner, v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
See McDonald v. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 1:24 pm
Supreme Court case of Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 8:31 pm
Visual Memory v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 6:37 am
” VTB Bank v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 4:32 am
For Reinert, the Court’s relative assertiveness in habeas can be explained as an instance of judicial self-defense against concerted attacks by the political branches (culminating in Boumediene) whereas its lassitude in Bivens litigation represents a kind of judicial self-abnegation with the Co [read post]
17 May 2019, 5:00 am
E.g., State of Calif. v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 5:00 am
E.g., State of Calif. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:18 pm
" The compromisers hoped that this would enable federal courts to correct clearly wrong state court decisions while not committing gross errors of their own or imposing their own precedents (rather than the Supreme Court's) on the state courts.The problem is that it takes considerable self-restraint and humility to say "I would not have decided the case that way, but it is within the limits in which reasonable people can differ. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm
A few days after the Supreme Court decided New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 9:23 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 9:23 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 7:24 pm
In Illinois v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:03 pm
Bowman v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:24 pm
It states in pertinent part: “A person who uses force as permitted in s. 776.012 (in defense of person), s. 776.013 (home protection), s. 776.031 (in defense of others) is justified in using such force and is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action for the use of such force, unless the person against whom force was used is a law enforcement officer…” In 2010, in Dennis v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 10:34 am
There are rare patent cases that challenge the validity of the patent statutes or the way those statutes are applied by the PTO (e.g., Apple v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:28 am
In addition, the requirement of reciprocity in order to take a credit for taxes paid to another state (i.e., that the other state must grant a similar credit against Louisiana individual income tax) is eliminated. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 3:48 am
But then last year came Ashcroft v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:20 pm
It’s the instinct of self-preservation kicking in I guess. [read post]
