Search for: "State v. Stephens." Results 6161 - 6180 of 7,112
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2009, 11:00 am by Chuck Ramsay
  Urge them to become a member immediately to defend you against the state's unscientific breath test machine. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 9:12 pm by Andrew Raff
United States and United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 4:30 am by Gene Takagi
United States (D.D.C. 2008) Federal requirement of > 1 director - Ohio Disability Association v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 4:59 pm
The lead attorneys on the brief are Stephen Poss (attorney of record), Stephen Halbrook, and others. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:19 am
Briefly, Fredreka Schouten at USA Today writes that a Court ruling in favor of the petitioners in Citizens United may drastically alter 2010 state gubernatorial elections by loosening restrictions on previously prohibited corporate and union donations, while the Boston Globe reports that the firefighters in Ricci v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 4:15 pm
Although the public, in the aggregate, backlashed against same sex marriage in the wake of Lawrence v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 6:01 am by Nate Persily
These first few posts will describe the results of an ongoing project on public opinion and the Constitution that I have begun with Stephen Ansolabehere of Harvard’s Government Department. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
This piece has galvanized the artistic skills of a highly experienced and talented team assembled from a range of disciplines including: Turner Prize-winning artist, Anish Kapoor; internationally acclaimed artist, Antony Micallef; Oscar-winning costume designer, Sandy Powell; one of Britain's leading artists, MODE2; BAFTA-nominated Art Director, Michael Howells; playwright, Simon Stephens; photographer, James Ostrer; Royal graphic designer, Mike Dempsey; V&A award-winning… [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:46 pm by Steve Bainbridge
That trend was reversed following the Supreme Court’s decision in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 11:09 am by Joe Mullin
Supreme Court on Monday considered the issue of what types of technology should be eligible for patent protection when it heard oral arguments in Bilski v. [read post]