Search for: "Study v. State" Results 6161 - 6180 of 15,013
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2009, 6:19 pm by Phil Cave
  She further notes the potential unconstitutionality of MEJA under such cases as  Reid v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 3:01 am
On this day in ...... 1956, via a 1-sentence per curiam order in Board of Trustees v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 12:30 pm by EEM
An exploratory study among asylum seekers in Switzerland," BMC Health Services Research 10:248 (Aug. 2010) [open access text]Tagged Publications. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Eric Claeys (George Mason/Scalia) on Penn Central v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 9:34 am by Alfred Brophy
 We talked about legal history, mostly -- State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 6:17 am
While the state's chief witness is testifying against you, you look over, wondering why he isn't objecting, only to find him studying a Chinese menu.entire post... [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 6:30 am by EEM
A Comparative Overview in 16 Countries (HUMA Network, Nov. 2010) [text]Most Important United States Supreme Court Case in Refugee Law: I.N.S. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 9:23 am by Alexandra Dunn
  We are grateful that her papers now provide a place for lawyers interested in preservation — and using local, state, and federal law to assist – to study and learn. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 8:48 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-5456, looks like a routine hold for Setser v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:44 am by Matt Sundquist
In the Detroit News, Laura Berman has a column on the State of Michigan's recent filing of an original action against Illinois. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 6:33 am by Frank Fagan
Sending takedown requests is a cost-saving alternative to a state-run monitoring workforce. [read post]
19 May 2009, 4:11 am
  For instance, the Supreme Court fundamentally restructured federal sentencing law through its 2005 decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 11:28 am by legalinformatics
Here is the abstract: This paper studies the use of hypothetical and value-based reasoning in US Supreme-Court cases concerning the United States Fourth Amendment. [read post]