Search for: "U.S. v. STATE OF TEXAS"
Results 6161 - 6180
of 8,656
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2012, 8:21 pm
” Watson v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 6:33 am
Adler) The University of Texas at Austin has retained Latham & Watkins to defend its affirmative action policy before the U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:37 pm
Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 563 (2003), and State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:55 am
The dissent argued that the State of Texas has a strong interest in (and a regulatory scheme in place for) ensuring that Texas attorneys maintain a high level of quality and that federalism concerns suggest that many of these cases should be adjudged at the state court level. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 12:01 am
Currently, thousands of other landowners’ Trails Act taking claims are pending in cases now before the U.S. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 1:40 pm
Co., 352 U.S. 500, 506–07, 77 S. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 7:23 am
The ruling in Adams v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
It held that under Volkswagenwerk AG v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 2:45 am
The Eastern District of Texas says "maybe," according to a post about a recent ruling in a patent case, Hill v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 11:19 pm
V&A Museum no. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 9:50 am
See, e.g., Furst v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 2:06 am
V ground for the refusal of recognition and enforcement. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:47 am
§ 1512 US v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:47 am
§ 1512 US v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:47 am
§ 1512 US v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:47 am
§ 1512 US v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:47 am
§ 1512 US v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:47 am
§ 1512 US v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:40 am
Darue Eng'g & Mfg., 545 U.S. 308 (2005). [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:39 am
The Daily Texan reports that the University of Texas has hired the firm of Latham & Watkins to represent the University in Fisher v. [read post]
