Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. " Results 6161 - 6180 of 8,927
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2011, 4:59 pm
According to the Center for Disease Control, in 2007, unintentional accidental deaths were the fifth leading cause of death in the United States. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 2:30 am
This was many years before the United States Supreme Court would decide to outlaw school segregation in Brown v. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 3:37 pm
 Accordingly it's good to learn how others put their cases together, how they deal with jurisdictional and enforcement issues, and how they propose to do so in a world of institutional change.Looking further afield, readers of both this blog and IP Finance will know that there has been an extensive and ongoing debate as to whether patent litigation, and in particular United States patent litigation, has had the effect of depressing patent values, thereby damaging the… [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:51 pm by Ben
 Last year, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided largely in favour of Mr. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
Third party challengers can seemingly inflict stock-price drop through an efficient patent invalidation mechanism provided at the United States Patent and Trademark Office, while betting against the targeted company’s stock price. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 10:16 am by Trey Childress
Bank of America, 549 F.2d 597 (9th Cir. 1976), Mannington Mills, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Duncan
(Public Knowledge) Michael Geist presentation: ACTA – The state of play (Michael Geist) Australia I thought cats were colour blind… Federal Court confirms Mars has exclusive right to use colour ‘Whiskas purple’ for cat food: Mars Australia Pty Ltd (formerly Effem Foods Pty Ltd) v Société des Produits Nestlé SA (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) FCAFC: On appeal, simulated flames from direct light found infringing: Bitech… [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:59 am by Marie Louise
Rahaman’s appointment to the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP) Update on the Wiley cases and ‘parallel exports’ (Spicy IP) Montenegro Montenegro designs law: a little novelty (Class 99) Portugal 2010 trade mark applications in Portugal (Class 46) Russia Russia softens criminal sanctions for trade mark infringement (Class 46) South America WIPO to support South American countries in regional collaborative project (WIPO) South Korea South… [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 8:45 pm by Chijioke Okorie
The ACDP reminded Parliament that “in the United States of America, fair use has been developed over a period of a 150 years of jurisprudence, while South Africa does not have this case law history or experience”. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:53 am by Ben
Cox, the privately owned subsidiary of Cox Enterprises, provides digital cable television, and telecommunications services in the United States, has more than 4 million subscribers and relied on the 'safe harbor' defence in US law.Whilst BMG acknowledged Cox had policies in place to deal with users who repeatedly infringed copyrights, it accused  Cox of failing to implement it's own policies and argued that this meant the ISP should be denied safe harbor… [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 5:59 am
The Board, however, saw a hole in the survey, namely that the wording of the survey questions suggested that the respondents could name only one brand.Frito-Lay North America, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Ben
As this exception has only recently been introduced in the United Kingdom - the CopyKat is doubly excited! [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
The strained attempts by the collected Primates to hold on to unity took two directions after the Tanzania gathering: on the one hand, they placed their hopes in a new Anglican Covenant; and on the other, they tried to establish arrangements for alternative pastoral oversight within the divided churches of Canada and the United States. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  The Supreme Court famously struck down the federal civil rights remedy for physical harassment and sexual assault in United States v. [read post]