Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. " Results 6161 - 6180 of 8,927
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2012, 8:20 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
  The most iconic case about presidential war power, Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 7:39 am by Leland E. Beck
  The Court has not requested the views of the United States in Christopher. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:50 am by Gregory Dell
In the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case Gena N. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 7:55 am
  Florida filing latest in Motorola v Apple war Nothing warms patent lawyers' cockles during these freezing winter months than more mobile patent disputes. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 4:47 am
Answer to today's ICJ inquiry puzzler above:The only nation-state that has declined to appear since 1981 in a case before the International Court of Justice is the United States of America. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:07 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
Bank, the good judge wrote: The United States Government paid taxpayer dollars to the largest of our financial institutions, and to the European Union Banks, in order to prop up those poorly run organizations. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 12:56 pm by Susan Brenner
During the time that she lived at Betty Shabazz Village, Davis worked at the United States Attorney's Office and the U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 7:47 am
When this happen, the United States Supreme Court had to step in, and thus we have the case of Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 1:14 pm by Venkat
Twitter could have reduced its need to be the instrument of government censorship by keeping its assets and personnel within the borders of the United States, where legal protections exist like CDA 230 and the DMCA safe harbors (which do require takedowns but also give a path, albeit a lousy one, for republication). [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:50 pm
Additionally, both pre- and post- issuance opposition has long existed for United States trademarks. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
“New” Defense: Prior Commercial Use The United States has not traditionally had an express prior user defense or experimental user defense, but such defenses have effectively always been present. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 1:16 pm by WIMS
 Commerce's finding of "critical circumstances" means that if the agency imposes preliminary countervailing duties on March 2, the duties will apply to all imports of cells and modules from Chinese exporters that were brought into the United States starting December 3, 2011. [read post]