Search for: "United States v. Robert"
Results 6161 - 6180
of 9,871
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2013, 3:18 pm
Breyer, Supreme Court, United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:47 pm
UPDATED ON JUNE 26, 2013: In a landmark decision penned by Justice Kennedy, in which Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined (Justices Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito dissenting), the United States Supreme Court held that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional as a violation of equal protection pursuant to the Fifth Amendment in the case United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1879) the Court explained states’ interests in regulating marriage with the simple declaration: “Upon [marriage] society may be said to be built. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:47 pm
S. 825 (1987), and Dolan v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:58 pm
The Justices did not make us wait: the first opinion of the day came in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:24 am
I focus here only on the Court’s invalidation of Section 3 of DOMA in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 10:00 am
A copy of United States of America v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 9:52 am
Windsor (Defense of Marriage Act)In United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 9:50 am
Robert L. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:25 am
On June 20, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Agency for International Development v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:25 am
On June 20, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Agency for International Development v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:41 am
United States [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:34 am
Brown)United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:22 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:00 am
Magarian’s comments on today’s decisions follow: The DOMA decision, United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 7:58 pm
Koontz v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:07 pm
Think of United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
Holder, this Term’s challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Court held that Section 4 of the law, which identifies the state and local governments that are subject to the Act’s “preclearance” requirement, is unconstitutional based on “current conditions” in the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:58 pm
The Supreme Court, in its 5-4 decision today in Shelby v. [read post]
