Search for: "Wells v. State"
Results 6161 - 6180
of 66,621
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2015, 4:05 am
The complaint alleges that the policy violates the 1st and 14th Amendments as well as provisions of the state constitution. [read post]
24 May 2023, 2:00 am
# # #DECISIONM. v Five Towns Review, Corp. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 3:39 am
In Simon v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:15 am
In Allaithi v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 3:00 pm
Roe v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 4:05 am
In Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray Reservation, Utah v. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 8:36 am
One can look to the case of Zoppo v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:15 am
This week on Capitol Hill and vicinity, the Supreme Court issues its decision in Iancu v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 11:44 am
However the court affirmed the dismissal of RLUIPA discrimination and unreasonable limitation claims, as well as of state and federal constitutional claims. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
In Green Haven Prison Preparative Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Katz v. [read post]
25 May 2013, 7:47 pm
Lemon, first-named plaintiff in the famous 1971 Supreme Court case of Lemon v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Plumbar v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 5:48 pm
Well, in West v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
" The complaint (full text) in Tosone v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 11:47 am
"] says that "Participants in 401(k) plans, employees of public schools and tax-exempt organizations with 403(b) tax-sheltered annuities, as well as state and local government employees with 457(b) deferred-compensation plans may be eligible to take advantage of these streamlined loan procedures and liberalized hardship distribution rules. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 12:01 pm
So states VC Leo Strine in Fletcher Int'l v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 11:20 am
Defendant then filed a motion for reconsideration, citing Byrd v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:28 am
As to the approach to be taken to justification (the burden of which falls on the government), “when the state puts forward its reasons for having countenanced the adverse treatment, it establishes justification for it unless the complainant demonstrates that it was manifestly without reasonable foundation” [66]. [read post]
