Search for: "v. " Results 6161 - 6180 of 493,821
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2012, 5:14 am by Isaac Gorodetski
Last week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Arizona v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 8:55 am by Media Law Prof
Martin Guggenheim, New York University School of Law, has published Violent Video Games and the Rights of Children and Parents: A Critique of Brown V. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 10:51 am
Regina v Chargot and Others House of Lords “In criminal proceedings against an employer after an accident ot work, it was sufficient for the prosecution to prove merely a risk of injury arising from a state of affairs at work, without identifying and proving specific breaches of duty by the employer. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:35 am
Finch and another v Richardson [2008] EWHC 3067 (QB); [2008] WLR (D) 389 “For the purposes of provisions in the Representation of the People Act 1983 in relation to illegal practices and to errors or false statements in declarations, ignorance of the law could constitute ‘inadvertence’ so as to provide an excuse for such errors and [...] [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:00 pm by Immigration Prof
Acosta, third-year law student, UC Hastings Two voices were heard loud and clear during Monday’s United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 5:51 am by Immigration Prof
Professor Josh Blackman, who submittted an amicus brief supporting the challenge to the expanded deferred action program on behalf of the Cato Institute in Texas v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:43 am by Broc Romanek
Yesterday, the Delaware Supreme Court posted video of that day’s oral argument for the appeal of RBC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 10:49 am
From the sounds of the on-the-ground reports I am getting, it seems that United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 1:47 am
Fisher v Brooker and Others House of Lords “A delay of almost 40 years in claiming a share of the copyright in a musical work, could not be defeated by the equitable doctrines of estoppel or laches when the defendants had suffered no detriment from the claimant's delay and, on the contrary, had derived a financial benefit [...] [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:07 pm by Kate Fort
Merits brief on behalf of the intervening tribes–Cherokee Nation, Oneida Nation, Quinault Indian Nation, Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Navajo Nation–in the Haaland v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:17 am by immigrationprof
PENNumbra, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review's online publication, has a discussion between Professors Peter Spiro (Temple) and Kit Johnson (Oklahoma) on "Immigration Preemption after United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 9:01 am
The Supreme Court has denied review in Dimon v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 3:39 pm by Robin Effron
Ed Brunet and John Parry (Lewis & Clark) present the following guest post: The growing list of summary judgment skeptics should find much to like in Monday’s Tolan v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 3:33 pm by constitutional lawblogger
The United States Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments in the affirmative action case of Fisher v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 5:01 am by CivPro Blogger
Professor Linda Silberman (NYU) has posted on SSRN a copy of her article, Morrison v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 4:13 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Blume and Brendan Van Winkle (Cornell Law School, Cornell Law School and Independent) have posted Atkins v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 12:33 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in Kucana v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 8:00 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Lawrence Rosenthal (Chapman University - School of Law) has posted Pragmatism, Originalism, Race, and the Case Against Terry v. [read post]