Search for: "v. JONES"
Results 6161 - 6180
of 9,905
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2011, 5:22 am
More on Jones v Kernott (you're not getting bored with this yet, are you?) [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 5:15 am
The case is Susan Seven-Sky v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 4:54 am
“The Jones v Kernott judgment does little to resolve the grey area of ex-cohabitees’ entitlements to a share in their former home.” Full story The Guardian, 10th November 2011 Source: www.guardian.co.uk [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 4:31 am
Here is a thing I wrote for the Comment is Free section of The Guardian website: Cohabitees’ property rights: still as clear as mud (I wanted to call it Gordian Knot, but that was a bit too cryptic…) And here is Hayley Trim’s excellent piece on the case, aimed at lawyers rather than punters: A not-so-common intention And here is the judgment to read you to bed. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:35 am
Last year, in State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 2:13 am
Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53; [2011] WLR (D) 321 “When a cohabiting couple bought a family home in their joint names and were both responsible for the mortgage, but without any express declaration as to their beneficial interests, the starting point was that equity followed the law so that the presumption was that they were joint tenants both in law and in equity. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
"The National Meat Association points out that the last time the Supreme Court reviewed the issue of uniformity in meat inspection, Jones v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:44 am
Jones, but continuing even after that case—to look closely at the capabilities of the device at issue. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:22 pm
The Supreme Court, Tuesday, heard the case of Antoine Jones, the Washington D. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 5:39 pm
The case of United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 4:41 pm
Jones, the GPS case. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm
Imputation involves concluding what the parties would have intended, whereas inference involves concluding what they did intend. ([126])And so, Jones v Kernott [2011] UKHL 53. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:23 pm
Jones(Updated/expanded 11/10) I've been reading the transcript (pdf) from yesterday's oral arguments at the US Supreme Court in US v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 11:37 am
For those who can't be bothered to read it: [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 10:39 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the U.S. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am
Jones and Smith v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:26 am
I've got parental duty so can't do a full note on Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53 now. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:26 am
I've got parental duty so can't do a full note on Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53 now. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:48 am
Although the specific issue in the case, United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:08 am
It is a heavy burden for a lawyer from that oft-criticized office to mount any defense of its prosecutions, but Andrieu repeatedly found ways to botch virtually every point as she argued Smith v. [read post]
