Search for: "*u.s. v. Parker"
Results 601 - 620
of 885
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2011, 8:15 am
” Villa v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 4:00 am
The judge cited Liteky v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 5:17 pm
Indicative of the new low-tolerance approach to IP infringement, are the words of Preet Bhara, U.S. [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:10 pm
“You Will Be Relieved to Know it is Now Harder To Discipline Bad Cops in Arizona” [Coyote] NYT runs Title IX “roster management” through a feminist echo chamber [Heather Mac Donald, Secular Right] Even with the slant, colleges’ willingness to contort their programs to comply with quotas tends to prove critics’ case [Althouse, Wendy Parker, College Sports Council, more] “AT&T v. [read post]
ANTI-GUNS-ON-CAMPUS BLOWBACK: You know, I raised this issue with a Faculty Senate colleague and was…
18 Apr 2011, 8:18 pm
Holders of concealed carry permits in the U.S. are arrested for violent crimes at a rate five times lower than non-license holders (even lower than police officers in many states). [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 6:34 am
KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 2:46 pm
But then U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 6:08 pm
United States, 483 U.S. 435 (1987), and the return of O’Callahan v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:12 am
Parker, Crim. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:06 pm
Parker, 2011 U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:01 am
Reiter.Washington, D.C. : U.S. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 10:15 pm
Parallel Networks v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
Patent No. 5,643,446 entitled FUEL FILTER AND PRIMING PUMP and owned by Parker-Hannifan. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
Patent No. 5,643,446 entitled FUEL FILTER AND PRIMING PUMP and owned by Parker-Hannifan. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:01 pm
The U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
CaldwellDocket: 10-622Issue(s): (1) Whether a binding agreement among multiple states and private companies is immunized from antitrust scrutiny under the state-action immunity doctrine of Parker v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 7:23 am
Supreme Court's opinion in Berman v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:58 am
The defense is that (1) the MSA is not a compact requiring congressional approval under the leading modern case, Parker v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 7:56 pm
Parker 2011 U.S. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 6:42 pm
Beard, 2011 U.S. [read post]
