Search for: "A. A. READ, Appeals Examiner"
Results 601 - 620
of 11,703
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2023, 9:00 pm
Can a Claimant’s Representative Cross-Examine the Vocational Expert? [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 8:21 am
Additionally, employers will want to examine the temporal proximity from industrial injury to resignation when defending claims. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:41 am
Moving to the actual Batson analysis, the court examined the questioning of white jurors along with the black juror who triggered the Batson objection. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
(Editor’s Note: Extended excerpts of the various legal proceedings cited in this piece can be read here.) [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
Decision of the Court of Appeal Canada Square appealed the decision to the Court of Appeal, again unsuccessfully. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
” Read further posts on the Kluwer Copyright Blog here, the Kluwer Trademark Blog here and the Kluwer Patent blog here. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:14 am
” Read further posts on the Kluwer Copyright Blog here, the Kluwer Trademark Blog here and the Kluwer Patent blog here. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:39 am
The examiner had initially issued written description rejections, but withdrew the rejections during the PTAB appeal briefing. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:05 am
You can do a preliminary witness examination with the court's permission. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:58 am
Flor testified she was “shocked” when she read the LOI and felt that it was a power grab” by GF. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:06 am
Appeal dismissed [63]. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
In a recent paper, Mark Klamberg, a professor at Stockholm University, examined methods of regulating the use of artificial intelligence in the military. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
Viagogo factor (1) requires, an assessment of the strength of the underlying claim relied upon, which is consistent with the obligation to examine the claim articulated in Standard Verlagsgesellschaft mbH. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:52 am
The Court of Appeals disagreed, finding no error. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 9:49 am
’s behavior during her cross-examination. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am
Yita (No. 23-494): This case examines the Federal Circuit’s reversal of a PTAB obviousness decision. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 7:00 am
Dash, the court examined an appeal against a summary judgment in favor of a doctor and Johns Hopkins Hospital. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 7:00 am
Dash, the court examined an appeal against a summary judgment in favor a doctor and Johns Hopkins Hospital. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
Therefore, if an examiner would find that Cloudbreak’s application served as prior art to Allgenesis’ pending application, Allgenesis would be able to challenge that on a separate appeal. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:00 pm
As Cellect’s attorney Paul Andre stated at oral aguments: “The point of this appeal really comes down to whether a statutory extension or adjustment in it by itself enough to invalidate patents. [read post]
