Search for: "Advocates v. State" Results 601 - 620 of 12,947
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2016, 11:24 am by Amy Starnes
Three news organizations — Victoria Advocate, KXAN-Austin and The Dallas Morning News — were awarded Spirit of FOI awards for investigations that made use of state and federal open records laws. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
State by state, health advocates pushed governments to require insurance companies to include within coverage health care ranging from mammograms to contraception. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 2:46 am
In Refcomp SpA v Axa Corporate Solutions Assurance SA [Case C-543/10], the Advocate General of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU, previously known as the European Court of Justice) interpreted Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 44/2001 on jurisdiction (the Article) to mean that where the general terms of a sale of goods contract incorporated a clause conferring jurisdiction, that clause could only be relied upon against the original parties to the… [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 1:10 pm by Tom Goldstein
I happened to be in the courtroom today for the argument in Doe v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 4:37 am
From the opinion:On remand from the United States Supreme Court, Kennedy v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 7:59 am by Eleanor Winslet
The Advocate General also stated that a local employment unit could be determined by member states, and would be on the facts of each case. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 11:40 am
In The League of Residential Neighborhood Advocates v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:36 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Supreme Court’s withdrawal of the longstanding constitutional right to abortion in Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 3:03 pm by Brian Wolfman
The following excerpt summarizes Stone's findings: [T]the eighteen cases are, in chronological order, United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:40 am by Matthias Weller
More precisely Article 7 (2) of the Brussels Ia Regulation had to be interpreted, according to which a person domiciled in a Member State may be sued in another Member State, ‘in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict, in the courts for the place where the harmful event occurred or may occur’. [read post]